CRM-M-13939 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 330 HAPPY AND OTHERS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. for the petitioners. Mr. Roshandeep Singh, AAG, Punjab. Mr. for respondent No.2. RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 27.04.2023, under Sections 379 59 of Arms Act, registered at Police Station Adampur, District Jalandhar (Annexure P-1) and compromise dated 2. This to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to of the compromise. 13939-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: HAPPY AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Sukhcharan Singh Gill, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Roshandeep Singh, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Avinash Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, for quashing of 27.04.2023, under Sections 379-B, 411, 482, 201 IPC and Sections 25, 27, 54, 59 of Arms Act, registered at Police Station Adampur, District Jalandhar 1) and subsequent proceedings arising t dated 21.02.2026 (Annexure P-3). This Court vide order dated 13.03.2026 to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-13939-2026 Date of decision: 02.04.2026 ….Petitioners ....Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Sukhcharan Singh Gill, Advocate Mr. Roshandeep Singh, AAG, Punjab. This is a petition filed under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik for quashing of FIR No.62, dated B, 411, 482, 201 IPC and Sections 25, 27, 54, 59 of Arms Act, registered at Police Station Adampur, District Jalandhar subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of 3). 13.03.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded send its report qua the genuineness s ....Respondents Bharatiya Nagarik FIR No.62, dated B, 411, 482, 201 IPC and Sections 25, 27, 54, 59 of Arms Act, registered at Police Station Adampur, District Jalandhar herefrom on the basis of had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded send its report qua the genuineness GURPREET 2026.04.06 14:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-13939 3. CRM-M-13939 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jalandhar On the basis of the statements so recorded, Jalandhar has submitted report dated compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for resp have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Following the principles laid down by th of this Court in another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is Sections 379-B, 411, 482, 201 IPC and Sections 25, 27, 54, 59 of Arms Act, registered at Police Station Adampur, District Jalandhar (Annexure P subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of 21.02.2026 (Annexure P 7. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. 02.04.2026 Gurpreet 13939-2026 2 Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jalandhar and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, has submitted report dated 25.03.2026 compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for resp have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by th of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 , this petition is allowed and FIR No.62, dated 27.04.2023, under B, 411, 482, 201 IPC and Sections 25, 27, 54, 59 of Arms Act, registered at Police Station Adampur, District Jalandhar (Annexure P subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of 21.02.2026 (Annexure P-3) are quashed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, Judicial Magistrate First Class, 25.03.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.62, dated 27.04.2023, under B, 411, 482, 201 IPC and Sections 25, 27, 54, 59 of Arms Act, registered at Police Station Adampur, District Jalandhar (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got their statements recorded. l Magistrate First Class, to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without ondent No.2 In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to e Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.62, dated 27.04.2023, under B, 411, 482, 201 IPC and Sections 25, 27, 54, 59 of Arms Act, 1) and dated Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.04.06 14:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.