Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2023 DAILYLAW 5164 (MAD)

ARUNKUMAR v. RAVIKUMAR

CMP/535/2023 · 2026-07-07

N Anand Venkatesh

Transfer Petitionbody2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

C.M.P.No.535 of 2023 in C.M.A.Sr.No.141188 of 2022 N.ANAND VENKATESH, J This petition has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 160 days in preferring the above appeal. 2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for fifth respondent. 3. Satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is allowed and the delay of 160 days in preferring the above appeal is condoned. 4. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order and post it for admission in due course. Registry is also directed to print the name of Mrs.R.Sreevidhya, learned counsel for fifth respondent, at the time of admission. It is made clear that the petitioner will not be entitled for interest for the delay period in the event of enhancement of compensation. 07.07.2026 gm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis