Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2023 DAILYLAW 5157 (PNJ)

JASPAL KAUR @ PAL KAUR v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/9986/2026 · 2026-05-08

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 204-2 Jaspal Kaur @ Pal Kaur State of Punjab CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present :- Mr. Mr. Abdul Aziz Ms. Gagandeep Kaur, DAG, Punjab ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 petitioner in case 305 [Section 61(2) added later on] of the Police Station Sadar Sandaur, District Malerkotla 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner pursuant to the order dated joined investigation and investigation of the case. 3. Learned State counsel on instructions, corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner required for the purpose of investigation. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. Since the petitioner interrogation is not required, the present petition is order dated 19.02.2026 6. However, if required, the petitioner(s) shall continue to join investigation as and when required to do so and shall abide by the terms and conditions, as laid down under Section 482 (2) BNSS. 08.05.2026 Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-9986 Date of decision: Jaspal Kaur @ Pal Kaur VERSUS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Mr. R.S. Rana, Advocate for Mr. Abdul Aziz, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Ms. Gagandeep Kaur, DAG, Punjab ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.7 dated 08.02.2025 305 [Section 61(2) added later on] of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Police Station Sadar Sandaur, District Malerkotla. Learned counsel for the petitioner pursuant to the order dated 19.02.2026 passed by this Court, the joined investigation and her custodial interrogation investigation of the case. Learned State counsel on instructions, corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner required for the purpose of investigation. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Since the petitioner has joined the investigation and interrogation is not required, the present petition is 19.02.2026 is made absolute. However, if required, the petitioner(s) shall continue to join investigation as and when required to do so and shall abide by the terms and conditions, as laid down under Section 482 (2) BNSS. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 9986-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 08.05.2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondent VINOD S. BHARDWAJ , Advocate for the petitioner(s). Ms. Gagandeep Kaur, DAG, Punjab. The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the for grant of anticipatory bail to the 08.02.2025 registered under Section Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at . Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that passed by this Court, the petitioner has her custodial interrogation is no longer required for Learned State counsel on instructions, corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not Heard learned counsel for the parties. has joined the investigation and her custodial interrogation is not required, the present petition is allowed and the interim However, if required, the petitioner(s) shall continue to join investigation as and when required to do so and shall abide by the terms and conditions, as laid down under Section 482 (2) BNSS. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.05.08 19:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document