CRM-M-8777 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 211 REENA STATE OF HARYANA CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. Present:- M for the petitioner. Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Sandeep Chopra, for the complainant. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Through the instant petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”), the petitioners seek anticipatory bail in case Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120 District Bhiwani 2. On the BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR 8777-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: Versus HARYANA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Sandeep Kumar Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Sandeep Chopra, Advocate for the complainant. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) Through the instant petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”), the petitioners seek anticipatory bail in case FIR No.351 dated 02.08.2024 registered under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC District Bhiwani. On 17.03.2026, the following order “Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.351 dated 02.08.2024 registered under Sections IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-8777-2026 Date of decision: 02.04.2026 ….Petitioner ....Respondent JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL r. Sandeep Kumar Yadav, Advocate Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana. Through the instant petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”), the petitioners FIR No.351 dated 02.08.2024 registered under at Police Station City Bhiwani, following order was passed by this Court: - Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner No.351 dated 02.08.2024 registered under Sections ….Petitioner ....Respondent Through the instant petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”), the petitioners FIR No.351 dated 02.08.2024 registered under at Police Station City Bhiwani, Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner No.351 dated 02.08.2024 registered under Sections GURPREET 2026.04.02 19:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-8777 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120 Bhiwani, District Bhiwani. petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. He submi consent, got the General Power of Attorney in his name and sold her land to various persons in connivance with other co persons after obtaining loan from the complainant forged committed any fraud as she neither appeared before the Registrar office at the time of selling of the land nor she had signed any documents to obtain any loan from the complainant company. He argues that hu Manoj Kumar has already been granted concession of regular bail by Co 21.07.2025 passed in CRM matter has been compromised between the parties. L counsel has further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to join the investigation as and when called upon to do so by the investigating agency. opposed the petition for bail and committed by submits that he is not aware of any compromise, if any, between the parties. behalf of the complainant, has filed seeks some time to file his vakalatnama. The same is taken on record. He has also affirmed the factum of compromise between the parties and submits that he has no objection if present petition is allowed. investigation within a week from today and would appear as and 8777-2026 2 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120- Bhiwani, District Bhiwani. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. He submits that the husband of the petitioner, without obtaining her consent, got the General Power of Attorney in his name and sold her land to various persons in connivance with other co persons after obtaining loan from the complainant forged documents. He argues that the petitioner has not committed any fraud as she neither appeared before the Registrar office at the time of selling of the land nor she had signed any documents to obtain any loan from the complainant company. He argues that husband of the petitioner namely Manoj Kumar has already been granted concession of regular bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 21.07.2025 passed in CRM-M-28415 matter has been compromised between the parties. L counsel has further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to join the investigation as and when called upon to do so by the investigating agency. On the other hand, learned State counsel has vehemently opposed the petition for bail and committed by the petitioner is serious in nature. However, he submits that he is not aware of any compromise, if any, between the parties. Mr. Sandeep Chopra, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the complainant, has filed seeks some time to file his vakalatnama. The same is taken on record. He has also affirmed the factum of compromise between the parties and submits that he has no objection if present petition is allowed. Adjourned to 02.04.2026. In the meantime, the petitioner is directed to join investigation within a week from today and would appear as and -B IPC at Police Station City Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. He ts that the husband of the petitioner, without obtaining her consent, got the General Power of Attorney in his name and sold her land to various persons in connivance with other co-accused persons after obtaining loan from the complainant-company on documents. He argues that the petitioner has not committed any fraud as she neither appeared before the Registrar office at the time of selling of the land nor she had signed any documents to obtain any loan from the complainant- sband of the petitioner namely Manoj Kumar has already been granted concession of regular ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 28415-2025. He submits that the matter has been compromised between the parties. Learned counsel has further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to join the investigation as and when called upon to do so On the other hand, learned State counsel has vehemently opposed the petition for bail and submits that the offence the petitioner is serious in nature. However, he submits that he is not aware of any compromise, if any, between Mr. Sandeep Chopra, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the complainant, has filed his memo of appearance and seeks some time to file his vakalatnama. The same is taken on record. He has also affirmed the factum of compromise between the parties and submits that he has no objection if present In the meantime, the petitioner is directed to join investigation within a week from today and would appear as and B IPC at Police Station City Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. He ts that the husband of the petitioner, without obtaining her consent, got the General Power of Attorney in his name and sold accused company on documents. He argues that the petitioner has not committed any fraud as she neither appeared before the Registrar office at the time of selling of the land nor she had - sband of the petitioner namely Manoj Kumar has already been granted concession of regular ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 2025. He submits that the earned counsel has further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to join the investigation as and when called upon to do so On the other hand, learned State counsel has vehemently submits that the offence the petitioner is serious in nature. However, he submits that he is not aware of any compromise, if any, between Mr. Sandeep Chopra, Advocate has put in appearance on his memo of appearance and seeks some time to file his vakalatnama. The same is taken on record. He has also affirmed the factum of compromise between the parties and submits that he has no objection if present In the meantime, the petitioner is directed to join investigation within a week from today and would appear as and GURPREET 2026.04.02 19:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-8777 when required by the Investigating Officer and cooperate with the Investigating Agency. In the event of arrest, she shall be admitted to int satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer. The petitioners shall also abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated investigation. 4. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions Ravikant, has submitted that the pe no longer required for further investigation. 5. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the interim order dated petitioner shall continue Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS 02.04.2026 Gurpreet 8777-2026 3 when required by the Investigating Officer and cooperate with the Investigating Agency. In the event of arrest, she shall be admitted to interim bail on furnishing of bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer. The petitioners shall also abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023.” Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 17.03.2026 passed by this Court, the petitioner ha investigation. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions has submitted that the petitioner ha no longer required for further investigation. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the interim order dated 17.03.2026 passed by this Court, is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No when required by the Investigating Officer and cooperate with the Investigating Agency. In the event of arrest, she shall be erim bail on furnishing of bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer. The petitioners shall also abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI titioner has joined the investigation and is In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the passed by this Court, is made absolute. The to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No when required by the Investigating Officer and cooperate with the Investigating Agency. In the event of arrest, she shall be erim bail on furnishing of bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer. The petitioners Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of joined the from ASI is In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the passed by this Court, is made absolute. The to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.04.02 19:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.