IN THE 219 Krishan Kumar State of Haryana CORAM : HON'BLE Present :- Mr. Mr. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The Bharatiya Nagarik petitioner in case Sections 305, 112, Police Station Urban 2. The of one Monu son Hisar after a trip bearing Registration near Real PG in sleep in PG and found that the s stolen by some investigation, offences added in this case documents. THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-24502 Date of decision: @ Mokhiya VERSUS Haryana HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD . Sanchit Punia, Advocate for the Mr. Paras Talwar, Sr. DAG, Haryana ***** BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The instant first petition has been filed Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for case bearing FIR No.351 dated 10.10.2025 112, 111(4) and 319 of the Bharatiya Urban Estate, District Hisar. The FIR in the present case has been son of Satbir, alleging that he alongwith trip from Rajasthan at about 12:00 Registration No.HR-14W-1015. The said in front of Sharda Public School. when they woke up in the morning said vehicle was missing. Alleging some unknown persons, the FIR offences under Section 112, 114(4) case as the stolen vehicle was PUNJAB & HARYANA CHANDIGARH 24502-2026(O&M) decision: 07.05.2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondent VINOD S. BHARDWAJ the petitioner. Haryana. filed under Section 483 of the grant of regular bail to the 10.10.2025 registered under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at been registered on the statement alongwith his friends reached 12:00 A.M. in his Scorpio vehicle said vehicle had been parked School. He and his friends went to morning at around 07:00AM, they Alleging that the same has been FIR got registered. During 114(4) and 319 of BNS were was sold by preparing forged SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.05.08 09:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 219 CRM-M-24502-2026(O&M) 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, where he was arrested on 04.12.2025. The petitioner is already in judicial custody and no recovery has been effected from the petitioner. 4. Learned State Counsel on the other hand contends that the petitioner is member of an organized syndicate allegedly involved in theft and sale of stolen vehicles by forging documents. He further contends that main accused-Paramjit is yet to be arrested and recovery of the vehicle remains to be effected. He however does not dispute that no investigation is pending qua petitioner and challan qua him already stands filed. The custody period of the petitioner is also not disputed. It is also argued that that the offences in question are triable by the Court of Magistrate and trial shall take long. 5. I have heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties and have gone through the documents appended along with the present petition. 6. Without commenting on the merits of the case and taking into consideration the nature of allegations levelled against the petitioner, the period of custody undergone by him as well as the fact that the offences in question are triable by the Court of Magistrate, I deem it appropriate to allow the present petition. 7. The instant petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on his furnishing requisite bail bond/surety bond to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate, concerned. SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.05.08 09:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 3 219 CRM-M-24502-2026(O&M) 8. It is made clear that the petitioner shall not extend any threat and shall not influence any prosecution witnesses in any manner directly or indirectly. 9. The observation made hereinabove shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and the Trial Court shall decide the case on the basis of available material. 10. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. 07.05.2026 (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) Sumit Gusain JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.05.08 09:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document