RSA-885-20 IN THE HIG 123 Jawahar Lal Pushpinder K CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. concurrent whereby the 2. appeal is yet 3. of present s account of n 25.09.2023, counsel for (last date of 4. Advocate fo appellant and put in appear 2019 (O&M) -1- HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA RSA Date o ar Lal Versus inder Kumar M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH None. I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The appellant-plaintiff is in rrent judgments and decrees rende by the suit for declaration and permane The matter pertains to the year l is yet to be issued. Perusal of the order-sheet(s) re sent second appeal, the same was re nt of non-appearance on behalf of the 2023, 23.02.2024 and 04.09.2024; o el for the appellant on 02 dates i.e. o ate of hearing). Today, in the first round of ate for Mr. PS Dhaliwal, Advocate ant and sought a pass-over. However, appearance on behalf of the appellant. D HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-885-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.08.2025 .… Appellant .... Respondent NIDHI GUPTA is in second appeal against the rendered both the Courts below ermanent injunction was dismissed. e year 2015 and notice in the main t(s) reveals that since the inception was repeatedly adjourned either on of the appellant i.e. on 05.08.2019, 024; or at the request of learned i.e. on 07.05.2024 and 14.01.2025 d of hearing, Mr. Supneet Singh, cate had appeared on behalf of the wever, in the second round none has ellant. the low ain tion r on 019, rned 025 ngh, the has RISHU KATARIA 2025.08.18 10:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-885-20 5. has exhibite litigation. It Court has be interest of ju casual and c counsel is Court is left for non-pros 6. 7. 12.08.2025 rishu 2019 (O&M) -2- A bare reading of the above f xhibited an utterly casual attitude in ion. It is to be appreciated that very has been expended in affording oppor t of justice. On the other hand, the ap and careless approach. It is clear tha is seriously interested in pursuing t is left with no other option except to prosecution. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, s 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable ove facts shows that the appellant tude in his pursuit of the present t very valuable public time of the opportunities to the appellant in the the appellant has adopted an utterly ear that neither the appellant nor his uing the present matter. Thus, this pt to dismiss present second appeal, any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No sent the the terly his this , RISHU KATARIA 2025.08.18 10:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.