IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 238-2 Varinder Singh and another State of Punjab and another CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present :- Mr. Dr. ( Mr. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ CRM-10667-2023 Since the main petition is fixed for today itself, the present application seeking preoponement of hearing has been rendered infructuous. Disposed of, as having been rendered infructuous. Main case The case registered vide DDR No.28 dated 12.03.2022 registered under Sections 307, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 1959 added later on) at Police Station City Moga, District Moga arising out of FIR No.243 dated 10.10.2019 registered under Sections 302, 307, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 Police Station City Moga, District Moga. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner fairly concedes that the trial is at an advanced stage and the case is now fixed for defence evidence on 30.04.2026. There was no interim stay when the notice IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-29412 Date of decision: Varinder Singh and another VERSUS Punjab and another HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ r. Manpreet Singh Dhaliwal, Advocate for the petitioner Dr. (Ms.) Savi Nagpal, AAG, Punjab Mr. Shivender Pal, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) 2023 Since the main petition is fixed for today itself, the present application seeking preoponement of hearing has been rendered infructuous. sposed of, as having been rendered infructuous. The present petition has been filed for seeking quashing of cross case registered vide DDR No.28 dated 12.03.2022 registered under Sections Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Section 25 & 1959 added later on) at Police Station City Moga, District Moga arising out of FIR No.243 dated 10.10.2019 registered under Sections 302, 307, 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 25 & 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 at on City Moga, District Moga. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner fairly concedes that the trial is at an advanced stage and the case is now fixed for defence evidence on 30.04.2026. There was no interim stay when the notice IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 29412-2022 (O&M) Date of decision: 28.04.2026 ...Petitioner(s) ...Respondent(s) VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Advocate for the petitioners. Ms.) Savi Nagpal, AAG, Punjab. , Advocate for respondent No.2. Since the main petition is fixed for today itself, the present application seeking preoponement of hearing has been rendered infructuous. sposed of, as having been rendered infructuous. filed for seeking quashing of cross case registered vide DDR No.28 dated 12.03.2022 registered under Sections (Section 25 & 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 added later on) at Police Station City Moga, District Moga arising out of FIR No.243 dated 10.10.2019 registered under Sections 302, 307, 34 of and Sections 25 & 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 at Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner fairly concedes that the trial is at an advanced stage and the case is now fixed for defence evidence on 30.04.2026. There was no interim stay when the notice SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.04.29 14:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 238-2 CRM-M-29412-2022 (O&M) of motion in the present petition was issued. 3. Taking note of the developments that have taken place during the interregnum and noticing that the case is already at a fag end, counsel for the petitioner does not press the instant petition so as to take all pleas before the Trial Court. 4. The present petition is accordingly disposed of as not pressed with liberty as aforesaid. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) 28.04.2026 JUDGE Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.04.29 14:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document