IN TH 208 Baljit Sing Dr. Harind CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU violation o ordinate B Singh vs. writ petitio observation COCP-2651-2023 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.2651 o Date of decision it Singh Versus arinder Kaur Principal and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Mohit Vashishat, Advocat for the petitioner. Mr. Karambir Singh, Advocate 2. Mr. Amtiaz Sandhu, AAG, Pu for respondents No.3 and 4. HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition tion of order dated 20.1.2020 (Anne ate Bench of this Court in CWP-12 h vs. Punjab University, Chandigarh petition was disposed of as infruc rvations :- “….Be that as it may, a petitioner retaining bo legal notice having bee not be a valid justificat Mr. Chawla, Advocate salary pertaining to the 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 2651 of 2023 (O & M) cision :-19.03.2026 …..Petitioner thers …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA dvocate vocate for respondents No.1 and G, Punjab ition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by a co- 12850-2019 titled as “Baljit digarh and others”, whereby the infructuous with the following ay, against an allegation of the g books unlawfully and of a been served, the same would fication for withholding salary. cate assures this Court that the the month of May, 2019 would VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.20 16.04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document respondent gratuity for of which, amount of handed ove above said required to the contem March 19 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-2651-2023 (O & M) be released to the pet four weeks from today. Statement of M accepted. It is further dir retiral benefits if not re date would also be relea weeks….” At the very outset, it is submi ndents No.1 and 2 that in complianc ity for an amount of Rs.10,00,000/- w hich, Rs.9,00,000/- already stands p nt of Rs.1,00,000/- a cheque dated 3 ed over to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the peti e said facts. In view of the facts noted abo ired to be issued in the present contem ontempt petition is disposed of. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, 9, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 petitioner within a period of ay. f Mr. Chawla, Advocate is directed that the admissible ot released to the petitioner till released within a period of four submitted by learned counsel for pliance of the Writ Court order, was payable to the petitioner, nds paid and for the remaining ated 31.3.2026 has already been e petitioner has not denied the ted above, no further direction is contempt petition. Accordingly, if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.20 16.04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document