CRM-M-64087 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (113) MOTI LAL ALIAS MOTILAL SHARMA STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: Present: ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking the grant of regular bail in FIR No. 0012 dated 22.01.2025 (Annexure P under Sections 108 and 3(5), and Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, registered at Police Station Loharu, District Bhiwani. 2. certificate, has submitted that the trial is, in fact, at the fag end. It is submitted that all the prosecution witnesses have been examined. The defence was given adequate opportunities to lead evidence same was not availed of. The matter is presently fixed for final arguments. Learned State counsel further submits that i ambiguities arose with regard to the call detail records, pursuant to which -1- 64087-2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH MOTI LAL ALIAS MOTILAL SHARMA Versus STATE OF HARYANA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Mr. Naresh Kumar, Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Ahlawat, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Swati Batra, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Assisted by SI Rohtash. **** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) The petitioner has filed the instant second petition under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking the grant of regular bail in FIR No. 0012 dated 22.01.2025 (Annexure P under Sections 108 and 3(5), and later on added Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, registered at Police Station Loharu, District Bhiwani. At the outset, learned State counsel, while filing the custody certificate, has submitted that the trial is, in fact, at the fag end. It is that all the prosecution witnesses have been examined. The defence was given adequate opportunities to lead evidence same was not availed of. The matter is presently fixed for final arguments. Learned State counsel further submits that i ambiguities arose with regard to the call detail records, pursuant to which IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-64087-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 24.03.2026 ……Petitioner ……Respondent ALOK JAIN Mr. Naresh Kumar, Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Ahlawat, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Swati Batra, Sr. DAG, Haryana. The petitioner has filed the instant second petition under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking the grant of regular bail in FIR No. 0012 dated 22.01.2025 (Annexure P-1), later on added Section 85 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, registered at Police Station Loharu, District Bhiwani. At the outset, learned State counsel, while filing the custody certificate, has submitted that the trial is, in fact, at the fag end. It is that all the prosecution witnesses have been examined. The defence was given adequate opportunities to lead evidence, however, the same was not availed of. The matter is presently fixed for final arguments. Learned State counsel further submits that it further transpired that certain ambiguities arose with regard to the call detail records, pursuant to which 24.03.2026 ……Petitioner ……Respondent The petitioner has filed the instant second petition under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking the 1), on 85 of the Bharatiya At the outset, learned State counsel, while filing the custody certificate, has submitted that the trial is, in fact, at the fag end. It is that all the prosecution witnesses have been examined. The however, the same was not availed of. The matter is presently fixed for final arguments. that certain ambiguities arose with regard to the call detail records, pursuant to which MANJU 2026.03.24 18:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-64087 the nodal officer was summoned. Subsequently, the petitioner filed an application, which is pending adjudication before the learned trial Court for 22.04.2026. 3. permission to withdraw the present petition, with a direction to be issued to the learned trial Court to expedite the trial. 4. the case, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn at this stage, and the learned trial Court is expected to make a positive endeavour to expedite the trial. 5. March 24, 2026 manju Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable: -2- 64087-2025 (O&M) the nodal officer was summoned. Subsequently, the petitioner filed an application, which is pending adjudication before the learned trial Court for 04.2026. Faced with the above, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition, with a direction to be issued to the learned trial Court to expedite the trial. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion o the case, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn at this stage, and the learned trial Court is expected to make a positive endeavour to expedite the Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. March 24, 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No the nodal officer was summoned. Subsequently, the petitioner filed an application, which is pending adjudication before the learned trial Court for Faced with the above, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition, with a direction to be issued to Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn at this stage, and the learned trial Court is expected to make a positive endeavour to expedite the Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE the nodal officer was summoned. Subsequently, the petitioner filed an application, which is pending adjudication before the learned trial Court for Faced with the above, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition, with a direction to be issued to n the merits of the case, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn at this stage, and the learned trial Court is expected to make a positive endeavour to expedite the MANJU 2026.03.24 18:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document