BNSS, 2023 is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.157 dated 06.10.2025, registered at Police Station Garhshankar, District Hoshiarpur, under Sections Act, 1959 and Sections 2. custody for name surfaced based on disclosure statement of co Singh, who allegedly stated that the petitioner had supplied 7 rounds of .32 bore, while recovery from the petitioner is 10 rounds of a case of no injury. There is no evidence to connect him with the co accused and the alleged Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.157 dated 06.10.2025, registered at Police Station Garhshankar, District Hoshiarpur, under Sections 308(4) BNS Act, 1959 and Sections 61(2), 249 and 253 of BNS (added later on). Learned counsel contends that the petitioner has been in custody for about 2 months and 19 days. He alleges false implication. His name surfaced based on disclosure statement of co Singh, who allegedly stated that the petitioner had supplied 7 rounds of while recovery from the petitioner is 10 rounds of e of no injury. There is no evidence to connect him with the co accused and the alleged occurrence. Further that, co the present petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.157 dated 06.10.2025, registered at Police Station Garhshankar, 308(4) BNS, Section 25 of the Arms 61(2), 249 and 253 of BNS (added later on). Learned counsel contends that the petitioner has been in He alleges false implication. His name surfaced based on disclosure statement of co-accused Jaskaran Singh, who allegedly stated that the petitioner had supplied 7 rounds of while recovery from the petitioner is 10 rounds of .30 bore. It is e of no injury. There is no evidence to connect him with the co- . Further that, co-accused, Karanveet PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.04.28 17:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. Singh has since been granted bail, vide order Annexure P-6. Challan stands presented on 10.12.2025, but charges have not been framed and there are total 19 PWs. He is not involved in any other case. 3. Learned State counsel opposes the bail on the ground that there are specific allegations against the petitioner by the co-accused of having supplied 7 rounds of .32 bore. He is, however, unable to controvert the submissions with regard to stage of the case; the petitioner being not involved in any other case and the co-accused having been released on bail. 4. Heard. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in particular that the petitioner is in custody for the last 2 months and 19 days; not involved in any other case; co-accused is on bail; challan has been presented on 10.12.2025, however, charges are yet to be framed and there are, in all, 19 PWs; the trial is likely to take a considerable time and further incarceration of the petitioner would be violative of his right enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, thus the present petition is allowed. 6. The petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on his furnishing requisite bail bond/surety bond to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate, concerned. 7. It is made abundantly clear that in case there is any breach of the aforesaid conditions, the State shall be at liberty to seek cancellation of bail as granted to the petitioner by this order. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.04.28 17:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. 8. In view of the above, it is clarified that the observations made herein above are limited for the purpose of present proceedings and would not be construed as any opinion on the merits of the case and the trial would proceed independently of the aforesaid observations. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.04.28 17:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.