Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2023 DAILYLAW 4964 (PNJ)

PREM SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/61827/2025 · 2026-03-12

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 156 Prem Singh State of Punjab CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present :- Mr. Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Sr.DAG, Punjab Mr. Satvir Singh, Advocate for the complainant. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 petitioner in case Section 318(4) and 61(2) of Bhawanigarh, District Sangrur 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner pursuant to the order dated joined investigation and is no longer required for investigation of the case. 3. Learned State counsel on instructions, corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of invest 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. Since the petitioner interrogation is not required, the present petition is order dated 12.02.2026 6. However, investigation as and when required to do so and shall abide by the terms and conditions, as laid down under Section 482 (2) BNSS. 12.03.2026 Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-61827 Date of decision: VERSUS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Mr. Gurcharan Dass, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Sr.DAG, Punjab. Mr. Satvir Singh, Advocate for the complainant. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.204 dated 318(4) and 61(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Bhawanigarh, District Sangrur. Learned counsel for the petitioner pursuant to the order dated 12.02.2026 passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined investigation and is no longer required for investigation of the case. Learned State counsel on instructions, corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Since the petitioner has joined the investigation and interrogation is not required, the present petition is 12.02.2026 is made absolute. However, if required, the petitioner(s) shall continue to join investigation as and when required to do so and shall abide by the terms and conditions, as laid down under Section 482 (2) BNSS. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 61827-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 12.03.2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondent VINOD S. BHARDWAJ for the petitioner. . Mr. Satvir Singh, Advocate for the complainant. The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the for grant of anticipatory bail to the dated 22.08.2025 registered under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at Police Station Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined investigation and is no longer required for investigation of the case. Learned State counsel on instructions, corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not Heard learned counsel for the parties. has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required, the present petition is allowed and the interim if required, the petitioner(s) shall continue to join investigation as and when required to do so and shall abide by the terms and conditions, as laid down under Section 482 (2) BNSS. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.03.12 19:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document