Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2023 DAILYLAW 4932 (PNJ)

GURSIMRAN SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/2584/2026 · 2026-04-21

Rupinderjit Chahal

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-2584 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 213 GURSIMRAN SINGH STATE OF HARYANA CORAM:- HON'BLE Present:- Mr. D.S. Virk, for the petitioner. Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Through the instant petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”), the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case 115, 118(1), 190, 191(2), 191(3) and 351(2) o BNS added later on) registered at Police Station Civil Line, District Sirsa 2. On ordinate Bench Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking anticipatory bail for the petitioner in FIR No.556 dated 30.10.2025 under Sections 115, 118(1), 190, 191(2), 191(3) and 351(2) of BNS 2023 (Section 117(2) of BNS added later on) registered at Police Station 2584-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: GURSIMRAN SINGH Versus STATE OF HARYANA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. D.S. Virk, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) Through the instant petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”), the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No.556 dated 30.10.2025 under Sections 115, 118(1), 190, 191(2), 191(3) and 351(2) o BNS added later on) registered at Police Station Civil Line, District Sirsa On 10.02.2026, the following order ordinate Bench of this Court: - “The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking anticipatory bail for the petitioner in FIR No.556 dated 30.10.2025 under Sections 115, 118(1), 190, 191(2), 191(3) and 351(2) of BNS 2023 (Section 117(2) of BNS added later on) registered at Police Station Civil Line, District Sirsa. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-2584-2026 Date of decision: 21.04.2026 ….Petitioner ....Respondent MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana. Through the instant petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”), the petitioner FIR No.556 dated 30.10.2025 under Sections 115, 118(1), 190, 191(2), 191(3) and 351(2) of BNS 2023 (Section 117(2) of BNS added later on) registered at Police Station Civil Line, District Sirsa. following order was passed by the Co- The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking anticipatory bail for the petitioner in FIR No.556 dated 30.10.2025 under Sections 115, 118(1), 190, 191(2), 191(3) and 351(2) of BNS 2023 (Section 117(2) of BNS added later on) registered at Police ….Petitioner ....Respondent Through the instant petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”), the petitioner FIR No.556 dated 30.10.2025 under Sections f BNS 2023 (Section 117(2) of - The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking anticipatory bail for the petitioner in FIR No.556 dated 30.10.2025 under Sections 115, 118(1), 190, 191(2), 191(3) and 351(2) of BNS 2023 (Section 117(2) of BNS added later on) registered at Police GURPREET 2026.04.22 13:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-2584 attributed to the petitioner attracts only the provisions of Section 117(2) of BNS, 2023 as the grievous injuries suffered by the complainant have been inflicted by blunt injury attributed to the petitioner is simple in nature. more time to prepare and argue the case. investigation as and when required by the Investigating Agency/Officer. In the event of the petitioner joining investigation, he shall be admitted to interim bail by the arresting/investigating officer on his furnishing adequate bail/surety bonds t officer subject to the following conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) of the BNSS [erstwhile Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.]: interrogation by a poli any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to a prior permission of the Court; section (3) of Section 480, as if the bail were granted under that section. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated petitioner has joined the investigation. 2584-2026 2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the role attributed to the petitioner attracts only the provisions of Section 117(2) of BNS, 2023 as the grievous injuries suffered by the complainant have been inflicted by blunt injury attributed to the petitioner is simple in nature. Learned State Counsel, on the other hand, seeks some more time to prepare and argue the case. On his request, adjourned to 21.04.2026. In the meantime, the petitioner is directed investigation as and when required by the Investigating Agency/Officer. In the event of the petitioner joining investigation, he shall be admitted to interim bail by the arresting/investigating officer on his furnishing adequate bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the arresting/investigating officer subject to the following conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) of the BNSS [erstwhile Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.]: i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; ii) that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court; iv) such other condition(s) as may be imposed under sub section (3) of Section 480, as if the bail were granted under that section.” Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 10.02.2026 passed by the Co joined the investigation. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the role attributed to the petitioner attracts only the provisions of Section 117(2) of BNS, 2023 as the grievous injuries suffered by the complainant have been inflicted by blunt weapon, whereas the injury attributed to the petitioner is simple in nature. Learned State Counsel, on the other hand, seeks some more time to prepare and argue the case. On his request, adjourned to 21.04.2026. In the meantime, the petitioner is directed to join investigation as and when required by the Investigating Agency/Officer. In the event of the petitioner joining investigation, he shall be admitted to interim bail by the arresting/investigating officer on his furnishing adequate o the satisfaction of the arresting/investigating officer subject to the following conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) of the BNSS [erstwhile Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.]:- i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for ce officer as and when required; ii) that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing ny police officer; iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without the iv) such other condition(s) as may be imposed under sub- section (3) of Section 480, as if the bail were granted under that Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of Co-ordinate Bench of Court, the Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the role attributed to the petitioner attracts only the provisions of Section 117(2) of BNS, 2023 as the grievous injuries suffered by the weapon, whereas the Learned State Counsel, on the other hand, seeks some to join investigation as and when required by the Investigating Agency/Officer. In the event of the petitioner joining investigation, he shall be admitted to interim bail by the arresting/investigating officer on his furnishing adequate o the satisfaction of the arresting/investigating officer subject to the following conditions as envisaged under i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for ii) that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without the - section (3) of Section 480, as if the bail were granted under that Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of Court, the GURPREET 2026.04.22 13:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-2584 4. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions Chand, has submitted that the petitioner ha longer required for further investigation. 5. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the interim order dated Court, is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS 21.04.2026 Gurpreet 2584-2026 3 Learned counsel for the State, on instructions submitted that the petitioner has joined the investigation and longer required for further investigation. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the interim order dated 10.02.2026 passed by the s made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No Learned counsel for the State, on instructions of ASI Gokul joined the investigation and is no In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the the Co-ordinate Bench of this s made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No of ASI Gokul no In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the this s made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.04.22 13:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.