251 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-27119-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision : 23.04.2026 Gram Panchayat Village Tiwala ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and Others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI Present : Mr. Shiv Raj Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG Haryana. ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not wish to press the present petition and would be satisfied at this stage if a direction is issued to respondent No.2-Deputy Commissioner, Charkhi Dadri to decide the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 42 of the East Punjab Holding (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948 in a time bound manner. 2. Learned State counsel submits that he would have no objection. 3. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is disposed off as not pressed with a direction to respondent No.2-Deputy Commissioner, Charkhi Dadri to decide the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 42 of the East Punjab Holding JITENDER KUMAR 2026.04.24 10:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh CWP-27119-2023 -2- (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948 within a period of three months from today. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off. ( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE ( RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI ) 23.04.2026 JUDGE jk NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO JITENDER KUMAR 2026.04.24 10:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh