CRM-M-70585 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 282 RANJODH SINGH GREWAL STATE OF UT CHD AND ANR CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Mohit Singla, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Mr. Inderjit Singh, RUPINDERJIT 1. This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 04.02.2025, under Sections 333, 324, 351(1) BNS registered at Police Station Sector 49, Chandigarh (U.T.) (A arising therefrom on the basis of 2. The had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Judicial Magistrate First Class 70585-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: RANJODH SINGH GREWAL Versus STATE OF UT CHD AND ANR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Mohit Singla, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Vaibhav Mittal, Addl. P.P., U.T. Chandigarh. Mr. Inderjit Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, for quashing of 04.02.2025, under Sections 333, 324, 351(1) BNS registered at Police Station Sector 49, Chandigarh (U.T.) (Annexure P-1) and arising therefrom on the basis of compromise (Annexure P The Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get ments recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Chandigarh and got their statements rec IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-70585-2025 Date of decision: 29.04.2026 ….Petitioner ....Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Mohit Singla, Advocate for the petitioner (Through VC). Vaibhav Mittal, Addl. P.P., U.T. Chandigarh. for respondent No.2. This is a petition filed under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik for quashing of FIR No.09, dated 04.02.2025, under Sections 333, 324, 351(1) BNS registered at Police Station 1) and subsequent proceedings compromise (Annexure P-2). Court vide order dated 15.12.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get ments recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got their statements recorded. ….Petitioner ....Respondents Bharatiya Nagarik FIR No.09, dated 04.02.2025, under Sections 333, 324, 351(1) BNS registered at Police Station subsequent proceedings 15.12.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get ments recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the orded. GURPREET 2026.05.01 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-70585 On the basis of the statements so recorded, Chandigarh has submitted report dated compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influ 4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in 6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus St SCC 303, this petition is allowed and Sections 333, 324, 351(1) BNS registered at Police Station Sector 49, Chandigarh (U.T.) (Annexure P therefrom on the basis of 7. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. 29.04.2026 Gurpreet 70585-2025 2 On the basis of the statements so recorded, has submitted report dated 22.01.2026 compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 , this petition is allowed and FIR No.09, dated 04.02.2025, under Sections 333, 324, 351(1) BNS registered at Police Station Sector 49, Chandigarh (U.T.) (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedings arising on the basis of compromise (Annexure P Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No On the basis of the statements so recorded, Judicial Magistrate First Class, 22.01.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble ate of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.09, dated 04.02.2025, under Sections 333, 324, 351(1) BNS registered at Police Station Sector 49, subsequent proceedings arising compromise (Annexure P-2) are quashed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No , to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble ate of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.09, dated 04.02.2025, under Sections 333, 324, 351(1) BNS registered at Police Station Sector 49, subsequent proceedings arising Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.05.01 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.