Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2023 DAILYLAW 4875 (PNJ)

KANSHI RAM v. PUNJAB AGRO INDUSTRIES CORPORATION LTD. AND ORS.

CWP/27587/2023 · 2026-03-05

Harpreet Singh Brar

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-25864 IN TH 249(3 cases) 1. Saminder Sin Punjab Agro 2. Bant Ram Punjab Agro 3. Kanshi Ram Punjab Agro 1 864-2023 and two connected matters IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AT CHANDIGA cases) Date er Singh VERSUS Agro Industries Corporation Limited VERSUS Agro Industries Corporation Limited i Ram VERSUS Agro Industries Corporation Limited tters NJAB AND HARYANA DIGARH Date of decision:05.03.2026 CWP-25864-2023 .....Petitioner SUS mited and others .....Responden CWP-27334-2023 .....Petitioner SUS mited and others .....Responden CWP-27587-2023 .....Petitioner SUS mited and others .....Responden 2023 itioner ondents 3 itioner ondents 2023 itioner ondents PUNEET CHAWLA 2026.03.07 11:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-25864 CORAM: Present : HARPREET 1. as they arise the facts are t 2. writ petition following pra 3. that prior to already raise Patiala seeki 2 864-2023 and two connected matters HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HA Mr. Himanshu Chhabra, Advoc cases. Mr. R.S. Kalra, Advocate for the REET SINGH BRAR, J. (Oral) This order shall dispose of the arise from a similar factual matrix. H ts are taken from CWP-25864-2023. The petitioner has approached t etition under Articles 226/227 of the ing prayers:- “a) For issuance of certiorari/mandamus for sett 03.01.2023 (Annexure P-10) pas b) Further for issuan mandamus directing the respo benefits of petitioner along with with all consequential benefits. c) Further to stay the dated 03.01.2023 (Annexure P during the pendency of present w Learned counsel for the respond ior to the filing of the present writ p raised an industrial dispute before t seeking redressal of the very griev tters E HARPREET SINGH BRAR Advocate for the petitioner(s) in all for the respondents. f the above-mentioned writ petitions trix. However, for the sake of brevity, 023. ched this Court by filing the present of the Constitution of India on the of a writ in the nature of setting aside the order dated ) passed by respondent No.1. suance of a writ in the nature of respondents to release the retiral with 18% interest per annum along fits. y the operation of impugned order e P-10) passed by respondent No.1 ent writ petition. spondents, at the very outset, submits writ petition(s), the petitioner(s) had efore the learned Industrial Tribunal, grievance which forms the subject all titions revity, resent n the of ated e of tiral long rder .1 bmits had bunal, ubject PUNEET CHAWLA 2026.03.07 11:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-25864 matter of the has failed to Learned cou adjudicated b of the petiti aggrieved ag Nos.25238, 2 pending adju on 15.07.202 in view of Tribunal, the for considera 4. petition(s) alr passed therei pending befo proceedings. been rendered 5. disposed of. 3 864-2023 and two connected matters of the present writ petition. It is furth iled to disclose the said material fa d counsel points out that the disp ated by the learned Tribunal and awa petitioner(s). It is further submitte ed against the said awards, have al 238, 28636 and 28615 of 2025, res g adjudication before this Court and ar 7.2026. Learned counsel for the respo w of the subsequent adjudication o al, the grievance raised in the present sideration and the present petitions hav In view of the fact that the already stands adjudicated by the l therein are subject matter of challe g before this Court, no further adjudic dings. Accordingly, the present petiti ndered infructuous. Pending miscellaneous applicat ed of. tters s further submitted that the petitioner rial fact in the present proceedings. dispute so raised has since been d awards have been passed in favour bmitted that the respondents, being ave already filed Civil Writ Petition 5, respectively, which are presently and are stated to be listed for hearing e respondents, therefore, contends that tion of the dispute by the learned present writ petition does not survive have been rendered infructuous. t the dispute raised in the present y the learned Tribunal and the awards challenge in separate writ petitions djudication is called for in the present t petitions are disposed of as having pplication(s), if any, shall also stand tioner dings. been avour being etition sently earing s that arned urvive resent wards titions resent aving stand PUNEET CHAWLA 2026.03.07 11:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-25864 6. paper-books March 05, P.C 4 864-2023 and two connected matters Registry is directed to place a ooks of the connected matters. , 2026 Whether speaking/r Whether Reportable tters ace a photocopy of this order on the (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE king/reasoned. : Yes/No ortable. : Yes/No n the RAR) PUNEET CHAWLA 2026.03.07 11:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document