CRM-M-9549 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 287 BALJINDER SINGH STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Veeraj Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Shaveta Sanghi, DAG, Haryana M for respondent No.2. RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. 1. This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 12.06.2024, under Sections 420, 406, 370 IPC, at Police Station Naggal, District Ambala, (Annexure P therefrom on the basis of 2. This to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Judicial Magistrate 9549-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: BALJINDER SINGH Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Veeraj Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners (Through Video Conferencing) Ms. Shaveta Sanghi, DAG, Haryana Mr. Amandeep Saini, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, for quashing of 12.06.2024, under Sections 420, 406, 370 IPC, at Police Station Naggal, District Ambala, (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 16.09.2025 This Court vide order dated 19.02.2026 to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded earned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ambala and got their statements recorded. On IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-9549-2026 Date of decision: 06.03.2026 ….Petitioner ....Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL (Through Video Conferencing). Ms. Shaveta Sanghi, DAG, Haryana. This is a petition filed under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik for quashing of FIR No.90, dated 12.06.2024, under Sections 420, 406, 370 IPC, at Police Station Naggal, subsequent proceedings arising 16.09.2025 (Annexure P-2). 19.02.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded earned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got their statements recorded. On ….Petitioner ....Respondents Bharatiya Nagarik FIR No.90, dated 12.06.2024, under Sections 420, 406, 370 IPC, at Police Station Naggal, subsequent proceedings arising had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded earned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got their statements recorded. On GURPREET 2026.03.10 10:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-9549 the basis of the s Ambala has submitted report dated compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Following the of this Court in another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and Sections 420, 406, 370 IPC, at Police Station Naggal, District Ambala, (Annexure P-1) and compromise dated 7. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. 06.03.2026 Gurpreet 9549-2026 2 the basis of the statements so recorded, Judicial Magistrate has submitted report dated 27.02.2026 compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 , this petition is allowed and FIR No.90, dated 12.06.2024, under Sections 420, 406, 370 IPC, at Police Station Naggal, District Ambala, 1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of dated 16.09.2025 (Annexure P-2) Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No tatements so recorded, Judicial Magistrate First Class, 27.02.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.90, dated 12.06.2024, under Sections 420, 406, 370 IPC, at Police Station Naggal, District Ambala, subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of 2) are quashed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No First Class, to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without as well as counsel for respondent No.2 In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.90, dated 12.06.2024, under Sections 420, 406, 370 IPC, at Police Station Naggal, District Ambala, subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.03.10 10:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.