CRM-M-21170- IN THE H (207) VIKRAM SINGH STATE OF PUNJ CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Mr. R *** MANISHA BATR 1. The Section 482 of Bh for grant of anticip registered under S Sanhita, 2023 (fo Police Station Kam 2. The a got recorded by th alongwith his fam the present petit Mandeep Singh, -2026 (O&M) 1 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH INGH Versus PUNJAB HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANIS Deepak Arora, Advocate for the p Mr. Roshandeep Singh, AAG, Punjab *** BATRA, J. (ORAL) The instant petition has been prefe of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanh anticipatory bail in case arising out o nder Sections 333, 118(2), 118(1) an 23 (for short “BNS”) (Section 324(a n Kamboj, District Amritsar (Rural). The aforementioned FIR was registe by the complainant Manpreet Singh a is family members was present at the petitioner armed with a kirpan, , who was armed with a datar JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRM-M-21170-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 30.04.2026 ... Petitioner ...Respondent ANISHA BATRA r the petitioner Punjab preferred by the petitioner under a Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) out of FIR No.26 dated 05.02.2026 (1) and 115(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya 324(a) of BNS added later on) at ural). registered on the basis of statement ingh alleging that on 04.02.2026, he at the main gate of his house, when an, accompanied by co-accused ar reached there and started using 2026 oner dent nder SS”) 2026 yaya n) at ment 6, he hen used sing AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.30 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-21170- abusive language. followed him. Hi upon his father by hit the left hand a struck blows with mother of the co Mandeep Singh. chairs lying in the The injured father After registration underway. Appre grant of anticipato Additional Session 3. It is a falsely implicated person of the com triable by Magist interrogation is no allowed. 4. Status there are serious a injuries with a swo a grievous injury a on his left hand w -2026 (O&M) 2 guage. The complainant came inside m. His father intervened and then th her by striking blows repeatedly with hand and left side of chest of his fath s with datar, thereby injuring left sid the complainant also sustained injury ingh. The assailants also ransacked in the courtyard. On clamour being r father of the complainant was rushed ration of FIR, investigation proceedin Apprehending his arrest, the petition ticipatory bail which has been dismis essions Judge, Amritsar vide order da It is argued by learned counsel for t licated in this case due some previou e complainant has been attributed to h agistrate. He is ready to join the n is not required. It is thus, argued th Status report has been filed. Learned rious and specific allegations against a sword on the person of father of th njury and two simple injuries. The in hand was of a substantial size. No inside his house but both of them hen the petitioner opened an assault y with his sword. Two of the blows is father. Accused Mandeep Singh eft side of waist of his father. The injury at the hands of co-accused sacked his house and damaged the eing raised, they fled from the spot. rushed to the hospital for treatment. ceedings have been initiated and are petitioner moved an application for dismissed by the Court of Learned der dated 07.04.2026. l for the petitioner that he has been previous enmity. No injury on the ed to him. The subject offences are in the investigation. His custodial gued that the petition deserves to be earned State counsel has argued that ainst the petitioner who had caused r of the complainant thereby causing The incised wound sustained by him . No exceptional or extra-ordinary them sault lows ingh The used the spot. ent. d are n for rned been the s are odial to be that used sing him inary AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.30 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-21170- circumstance for petitioner. Taking victim and for c interrogation of th does not deserve to 5. This C for the parties at co 6. The voluntarily caused of the complainan caused by sword. at its nascent stag granted in excepti safety of pre-arre knowledge. In ca Investigating Agen adversely effectin order of anticipa procedure of crim law that the powe in extra-ordinary taking into conside conviction may en circumstance is, h -2026 (O&M) 3 e for grant of anticipatory bail is Taking into consideration the nature o for conducting thorough investigat n of the petitioner is must. It is, ther erve to be allowed. This Court has heard the rival submis es at considerable length. The petitioner alongwith the co caused simple as well as grievous inju lainant. The injury attributed to him is word. The allegations against him are t stage. It is well settled that anticipa xceptional circumstances only as a p arrest bail would certainly not dis case custodial interrogation of th g Agency, that shall leave many glarin ffecting the investigation. The Court ticipatory bail does not operate as f criminal cases by the trial Court. It powers for grant of pre-arrest bail ar inary and exceptional circumstances onsideration the nature of the accusati ay entail. In the instant case, no such e is, however, made out from the ple ail is made out in favour of the ature of the injuries sustained by the estigation in the matter, custodial s, therefore, argued that the petition ubmissions made by learned counsel e co-accused is alleged to have s injuries on the person of the father him is on the left hand of the victim im are serious in nature. The case is ticipatory bail to an accused can be as a person couched in comparative ot disclose all the facts within his of the petitioner is denied to the glaring loopholes and gaps, thereby Court is also required to see that an ate as inroad in the normal legal urt. It is well settled proposition of bail are to be exercised by the Court ances and with great caution while ccusation and the sentence which the o such exceptional or extra-ordinary the pleas as taken by the petitioner. the y the odial tition unsel have ather ictim se is n be ative n his the reby at an legal n of ourt hile h the inary oner. AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.30 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-21170- For the purpose interrogation of t discussed facts, th to be dismissed. A 7. It is m the purpose of dec on the merits of th 8. Since any, is rendered in 30.04.2026 Amit Sharma -2026 (O&M) 4 rpose of conducting thorough and p n of the petitioner is must. Taking cts, this Court is of the considered opi sed. Accordingly the petition is dismi It is made clear that any observation of deciding the present petition and t s of the case. Since the main petition has been dism ered infructuous. (MA Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes Whether reportable:- Yes/No and proper investigation custodial aking into consideration the above red opinion that the petition deserves dismissed.
vation made herein above is only for and the same shall have no bearing dismissed, pending application, if (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No odial bove erves y for aring n, if AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.30 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.