Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2023 DAILYLAW 4803 (PNJ)

MANGE RAM ALIAS KAKAR v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/54850/2025 · 2026-03-09

Aman Chaudhary

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

BNSS, 2023 is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.250 dated 14.07 Bhiwani, under Sections 2. granted regular bail vide order dated unable to appear before the trial Court on account of date of hearing custody. Charges have been framed on stand examined and there are still other case. Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR 250 dated 14.07.2022, registered at Police Station Siwani, District i, under Sections 323, 34, 341, 379-B and 506 IPC. Learned counsel contends that the petitioner was initially granted regular bail vide order dated 07.11.2022, unable to appear before the trial Court on account of date of hearing, and surrendered on 13.02.2025 custody. Charges have been framed on 16.01.2023, stand examined and there are still 3 more to go. Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR .2022, registered at Police Station Siwani, District B and 506 IPC. Learned counsel contends that the petitioner was initially 07.11.2022, whereafter he was unable to appear before the trial Court on account of noting down wrong , and surrendered on 13.02.2025 and since then, he is in 16.01.2023, however, only 8 PWs more to go. He is not involved in any PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.03.09 18:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. 3. Learned State counsel opposes the bail on the ground that there are specific allegations of against the petitioner and the co-accused of having snatched Rs.4700/- and willfully absented from the proceedings. However, he is unable to controvert the submissions with regard to stage of the case and the petitioner being not involved in any other case. 4. Heard. 5. 6. The petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail, subject to furnishing bail/heavy surety bonds to the satisfaction of trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned, if not required in any other case and shall abide by the following conditions:- (i) The petitioner will not tamper with the evidence during the trial. (ii) The petitioner will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witnesses. (iii) The petitioner will appear before the trial Court on each and every date fixed, unless is exempted by a specific order of Court. (iv) The petitioner shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which, he is an accused, or for commission of which he is suspected of. (v) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.03.09 18:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. coerce, induce, threaten or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/ her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence in any manner. (vi) The petitioner shall not in any manner misuse his liberty. (vii) The petitioner shall furnish his address and mobile number by way of an affidavit to the trial Court and not change the same till conclusion of trial and if for any reasons, he seeks to change either of the aforesaid, it shall be done only with prior information to the learned trial Court. (viii) The petitioner shall not leave the country without prior permission of the trial Court. (ix) The petitioner shall also report to the concerned Police Station on the first Monday of every month. (x) The trial Court/Duty Magistrate may impose any other condition, as deemed appropriate while releasing the petitioner. 7. It is made abundantly clear that in case there is any breach of the aforesaid conditions, the State shall be at liberty to seek cancellation of bail as granted to the petitioner by this order. 8. In view of the above, it is clarified that the observations made herein above are limited for the purpose of present proceedings and would not be construed as any opinion on the merits of the case and the trial would proceed independently of the aforesaid observations. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.03.09 18:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.