CRM-M-19735 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 278 ROHIT GAHLYAN STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Ketan Antil, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. Mr. J.S. Thakur, Advocate for respondent No.2. RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 12.10.2025, under Sections 110, 115, 351(3) BNS, at Police Station Sector 27 Sonipat, District Sonipat (Annexure P therefrom on the basis of 2. This to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Ma of the compromise. 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Judicial Magistrate First Class 19735-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: ROHIT GAHLYAN Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Ketan Antil, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. Mr. J.S. Thakur, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, for quashing of 12.10.2025, under Sections 110, 115, 351(3) BNS, at Police Station Sector 27 Sonipat, District Sonipat (Annexure P-1) and therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 28.02.2026 (Annexure P This Court vide order dated 10.04.2026 to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sonepat and got their statements recorded. On IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-19735-2026 Date of decision: 05.05.2026 ….Petitioner ....Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. This is a petition filed under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik for quashing of FIR No.318, dated 12.10.2025, under Sections 110, 115, 351(3) BNS, at Police Station Sector 27 1) and subsequent proceedings arising 28.02.2026 (Annexure P-2). 10.04.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded gistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got their statements recorded. On ….Petitioner ....Respondents Bharatiya Nagarik FIR No.318, dated 12.10.2025, under Sections 110, 115, 351(3) BNS, at Police Station Sector 27 nt proceedings arising had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded gistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got their statements recorded. On GURPREET 2026.05.06 16:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-19735 the basis of the statement Sonepat has submitted report dated compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Following the princi of this Court in another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and Sections 110, 115, 351(3) BNS, at Police Station Sector 27 Sonipat, District Sonipat (Annexure P basis of compromise 7. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. 05.05.2026 Gurpreet 19735-2026 2 the basis of the statements so recorded, Judicial Magistrate First Class, has submitted report dated 28.04.2026 compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 , this petition is allowed and FIR No.318, dated 12.10.2025, under Sections 110, 115, 351(3) BNS, at Police Station Sector 27 Sonipat, District Sonipat (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the compromise dated 28.02.2026 (Annexure P Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No Judicial Magistrate First Class, 28.04.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. ples laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.318, dated 12.10.2025, under Sections 110, 115, 351(3) BNS, at Police Station Sector 27 Sonipat, District subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the (Annexure P-2) are quashed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Judicial Magistrate First Class, to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without as counsel for respondent No.2 In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to ples laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.318, dated 12.10.2025, under Sections 110, 115, 351(3) BNS, at Police Station Sector 27 Sonipat, District subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.05.06 16:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.