CRM-M- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT YOGESH @JYOTI & ANR. STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Argued by SURYA P Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 09.03.2026 Court, Jalandhar, abovementioned order, the bail result thereof, the procure their 2. the petitioner According to learned counsel for the petitioners not appear addiction center at -17668-2026(O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH YOGESH @JYOTI & ANR. VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA P Argued by : Mr. Paras Jagga, Advocate for Mr. Eklavya Darshi, DAG Punjab. SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section 528 of Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023’, seeking 09.03.2026 (Annexure P-2) passed by the Court, Jalandhar, hereinafter referred to as ‘trial Court’ abovementioned order, the bails of petitioner result thereof, the bail bonds of the petitioner their presence in the Court, their warrant It has been contended by learned counsel for the pet the petitioners were regularly appearing before the learned trial Court According to learned counsel for the petitioners not appear before the learned trial Court addiction center at Civil Hospital Jalandhar 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-17668-2026(O&M) DECIDED ON: 07.05.2026 .....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PARTAP SINGH , Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Eklavya Darshi, DAG Punjab. This is a petition filed under Section 528 of ‘the Bharatiya ’, seeking for quashing of order dated ) passed by the Court of learned Judge, Special hereinafter referred to as ‘trial Court’ only. By virtue of of petitioners have been cancelled. As a of the petitioners have been forfeited and to warrants of arrest have been issued. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that regularly appearing before the learned trial Court According to learned counsel for the petitioners, on 09.03.2026 they could before the learned trial Court due to their admission in de Civil Hospital Jalandhar, and that their counsel had filed (O&M) .....PETITIONERS .....RESPONDENT Bharatiya for quashing of order dated Judge, Special only. By virtue of As a forfeited and to issued. that regularly appearing before the learned trial Court. could their admission in de- their counsel had filed GAURAV THAKUR 2026.05.07 18:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M- the application for by the learned trial Court. abovementioned circumstances, the impugned o deserves to be quashed. 3. present before the learned trial Court imposed in the bail order left with no option but to cancel the bail order issue warrant illegality in the abovementioned order, there is no scope for interference in the impug 4. liberty for the petitioner move application prayed for a direction to th application 5. a direction to the petitioner within a period of one month from today learned trial Court and move application directed to dispose of the bail application clarified that the learned trial Court in the exercise of its discretion shall be at liberty to impose penalty under Section 491 of BNSS (erstwhile Section 446 of CrPC) -17668-2026(O&M) the application for exemption on the same day, by the learned trial Court. As per learned counsel for the petitioners, in the abovementioned circumstances, the impugned o deserves to be quashed. In view of above, once, admittedly before the learned trial Court in compliance with the conditions imposed in the bail order(s), it is hereby held that the learned trial left with no option but to cancel the bail order issue warrant of arrest against the petitioner illegality in the abovementioned order, there is no scope for interference in the impugned order. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner liberty for the petitioners to surrender before the learned trial Court and move application(s) for bail. The learned counsel for the petitioner prayed for a direction to the learned trial Court to dispose of the bail application(s), to be moved by the petitioner In view of above, the present petition is hereby a direction to the petitioners to surrender before the learned trial Court within a period of one month from today learned trial Court and move application(s) directed to dispose of the bail application clarified that the learned trial Court in the exercise of its discretion shall be at liberty to impose penalty under Section 491 of BNSS (erstwhile Section 446 of CrPC), as per law. 2 exemption on the same day, but, the same was declined As per learned counsel for the petitioners, in the abovementioned circumstances, the impugned order was passed, which ove, once, admittedly the petitioners were in compliance with the conditions , it is hereby held that the learned trial Court was left with no option but to cancel the bail order(s), forfeit the bail bonds and of arrest against the petitioners. Since apparently, there is no illegality in the abovementioned order, there is no scope for interference in At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners has sought to surrender before the learned trial Court and for bail. The learned counsel for the petitioners e learned trial Court to dispose of the bail , to be moved by the petitioners, in a time-bound manner. In view of above, the present petition is hereby disposed of with to surrender before the learned trial Court within a period of one month from today. If they surrender before the (s) for bail, the learned trial Court is directed to dispose of the bail application(s) on the same day. It is, however, clarified that the learned trial Court in the exercise of its discretion shall be at liberty to impose penalty under Section 491 of BNSS (erstwhile Section was declined As per learned counsel for the petitioners, in the rder was passed, which not in compliance with the conditions Court was he bail bonds and . Since apparently, there is no illegality in the abovementioned order, there is no scope for interference in has sought to surrender before the learned trial Court and has e learned trial Court to dispose of the bail with to surrender before the learned trial Court surrender before the for bail, the learned trial Court is . It is, however, clarified that the learned trial Court in the exercise of its discretion shall be at liberty to impose penalty under Section 491 of BNSS (erstwhile Section GAURAV THAKUR 2026.05.07 18:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M- 6. disposed of, accordingly. Gaurav Thakur -17668-2026(O&M) Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shal disposed of, accordingly. 3 Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand l also stand GAURAV THAKUR 2026.05.07 18:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document