SANJEEV KUMAR BINDAL v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CRM-M/22639/2026 · 2026-04-27
Surya Partap Singh
body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 4754 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 4754 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 146
SANJEEV KUMAR BINDAL STATE OF
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE
Present:
SURYA P
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 24.12.2024 proclaimed person of learned referred to as ‘trial Court’ Negotiable Instruments Act, i.e. case No.NACT/ Kumari V/s
2.
3.
Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG Haryana respondent/State. Hence, service of notice upon the State is hereby -22639-2026(O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH
SANJEEV KUMAR BINDAL
VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA P
Mr. Vishal Sodhi, Advocate for
Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG Haryana SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J (ORAL)
This is a petition filed under Section 528 of Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023’, seeking 24.12.2024 (Annexure P-11), whereby the petitioner has been declared a proclaimed person. The abovementioned order has been passed learned Judicial Magistrate First Class referred to as ‘trial Court’ only, in a complaint case Negotiable Instruments Act, i.e. case No.NACT/ Kumari V/s M/s Sky Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. etc.’
Notice of motion. Since advance notice has already been served upon the State, Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG Haryana respondent/State. Hence, service of notice upon the State is hereby 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-22639-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 27.04.2026
.....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PARTAP SINGH for the petitioner. Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG Haryana. This is a petition filed under Section 528 of ‘the Bharatiya ’, seeking for quashing of order dated whereby the petitioner has been declared a . The abovementioned order has been passed by the Court Judicial Magistrate First Class Panchkula, hereinafter being , in a complaint case, for an offence under Negotiable Instruments Act, i.e. case No.NACT/1255/2019, titled as ‘Raj Sky Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. etc.’. Since advance notice has already been served upon the State, Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondent/State. Hence, service of notice upon the State is hereby
(O&M) .2026 .....PETITIONER .....RESPONDENTS Bharatiya for quashing of order dated whereby the petitioner has been declared a Court being for an offence under Raj Since advance notice has already been served upon the State, accepts notice on behalf of respondent/State. Hence, service of notice upon the State is hereby GAURAV THAKUR 2026.04.27 18:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-
dispensed with. However, n learned State counsel has opted to orally oppose the present petition
4. petitioner permitted to appear the learned trial Court to petitioner within a time
5. a direction to the pe a period of one month from today.
If he surrenders before the learned trial Court within the stipulated period and moves an application for bail, the learned trial Court shall admit the petitioner however, clarified that the learned trial Court in the exercise of its discretion shall be at liberty to impose penalty under Section 491 of BNSS (erstwhile Section 446 of CrPC), as per law. The abovementioned order shall b subject to the payment of Rs.25,000/ the Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, Panchkula. Gaurav Thakur -22639-2026(O&M)
dispensed with. However, no formal reply has been filed by learned State counsel has opted to orally oppose the present petition
The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner would be satisfied, and would not press this petition, if he is permitted to appear before the learned trial Court, and a direction is given to the learned trial Court to dispose of the bail application moved by the petitioner within a time-bound manner. In view of above, the present petition is hereby a direction to the petitioner to surrender before the learned trial Court within a period of one month from today. If he surrenders before the learned trial Court within the stipulated period and moves an application for bail, the learned trial Court shall admit the petitioner however, clarified that the learned trial Court in the exercise of its discretion shall be at liberty to impose penalty under Section 491 of BNSS (erstwhile Section 446 of CrPC), as per law. The abovementioned order shall b subject to the payment of Rs.25,000/- as costs. The costs be deposited with Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, Panchkula. 2
formal reply has been filed by the State and the learned State counsel has opted to orally oppose the present petition.
The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the would be satisfied, and would not press this petition, if he is the learned trial Court, and a direction is given to dispose of the bail application moved by the In view of above, the present petition is hereby disposed of with titioner to surrender before the learned trial Court within a period of one month from today. If he surrenders before the learned trial Court within the stipulated period and moves an application for bail, the learned trial Court shall admit the petitioner to bail on the same day. It is, however, clarified that the learned trial Court in the exercise of its discretion shall be at liberty to impose penalty under Section 491 of BNSS (erstwhile Section 446 of CrPC), as per law. The abovementioned order shall b as costs. The costs be deposited with Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, Panchkula. the State and the The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the would be satisfied, and would not press this petition, if he is the learned trial Court, and a direction is given to dispose of the bail application moved by the with titioner to surrender before the learned trial Court within a period of one month from today. If he surrenders before the learned trial Court within the stipulated period and moves an application for bail, the . It is, however, clarified that the learned trial Court in the exercise of its discretion shall be at liberty to impose penalty under Section 491 of BNSS (erstwhile Section 446 of CrPC), as per law. The abovementioned order shall be as costs. The costs be deposited with GAURAV THAKUR 2026.04.27 18:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document