IN THE 215 Sumit State of Haryana CORAM : HON'BLE Present :- None Ms. Mr. for VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The Bharatiya Nagarik petitioner in case Sections 115, 117(2), 2023 at Police Station 2. Briefly present petition 12:00 a.m., the Department, along at Shiv Colony. same, whereupon the complainant. armed with an iron third, unidentified sustained serious The assailants THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-69337 Date of decision: VERSUS Haryana HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD None for the petitioner. Ms. Chhavi Sharma, Astt. AG, Haryana Mr. Rohit Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Sunil Hooda, Advocate for the ***** BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The instant first petition has been filed Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for case bearing FIR No.224 dated 117(2), 110, 351(3), 3(5), 333 of the Station Sector Adampur, District Hisar. Briefly stated, the facts of the present are that during the intervening night complainant, Sunil Kumar, a along with his labourer, Monu, was It is stated that upon a knock at whereupon three persons entered the premises complainant. Among the assailants, Sumit iron pipe, Ashim was armed with unidentified person was armed with a wooden serious injuries, including fractures to belong to the family of the complainant’s PUNJAB & HARYANA CHANDIGARH 69337-2025(O&M) decision: 13.01.2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondent VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Haryana. the complainant. filed under Section 483 of the grant of regular bail to the 31.07.2025 registered under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Hisar. present case, as averred in the night of 30.07.2025, at about contractor in the Electricity was asleep in his house situated at the gate, Monu opened the premises and started assaulting Sumit (the petitioner herein) was with a wooden binda, while the wooden danda. The complainant to the fingers of both hands. complainant’s brother-in-law SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.01.14 19:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 215 CRM-M-69337-2025(O&M) (sala), with whom they have certain prior discord. As per the FIR, the applicant Sumit struck the complainant on the head with an iron pipe, while co-accused Ashim, along with the third assailant, inflicted injuries on various parts of his body. Monu also sustained injuries when he attempted to intervene and rescue the complainant. It is further stated that after issuing threats to the complainant, the assailants fled from the spot carrying their weapons, having also taken away an amount of ₹1,35,000/- and bolting the gate from outside. 3. Mr. Rohit Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Sunil Hooda, Advocate appears on behalf of the complainant and files his vakalatnama. The same is taken on record. He contends that the parties have amicably resolved their dispute and that he would have no objection in case the concession of regular bail is granted to the petitioner. 4. It is averred in the petition that the petitioner is not involved in any other criminal case and is in custody since 05.10.2025. 4. Learned State Counsel submits that the investigation in the case is already complete, however, trial is yet to commence. He, however, does not dispute the facts noticed above. 5. I have heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the state as well as on behalf of the complainant and have gone through the documents appended along with the present petition. 6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances as noticed hereinabove, the period of custody already undergone by the petitioner, his clean antecedents and the fact that the parties have amicably resolved the dispute, I deem it appropriate to allow the present petition. SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.01.14 19:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 3 215 CRM-M-69337-2025(O&M) 7. The instant petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on his furnishing requisite bail bond/surety bond to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate, concerned. 8. It is made clear that the petitioner shall not extend any threat and shall not influence any prosecution witnesses in any manner directly or indirectly. 9. The observation made hereinabove shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and the Trial Court shall decide the case on the basis of available material. 10. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. 13.01.2026 (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) Sumit Gusain JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.01.14 19:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document