IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 103-2 Bikramjit Singh @ Bikram Singh @ Monu State of Punjab CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present :- Mr. Dr. ( Mr. V.K. Sandhir, Advocate for the complainant. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 the petitioner in case Sections 109, 304, 3(5) of the of the Arms Act, 1959 2. Learned counsel for the petit pursuant to the order dated has joined investigation and is no longer required for investigation of the case. 3. Learned State counsel on instructions, corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. Since the petitioner custodial interrogation is not required, the present petition is interim order dated IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-42241 Date of decision: Bikramjit Singh @ Bikram Singh @ Monu VERSUS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Mr. Kushagra Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner Dr. (Ms.) Savi Nagpal, AAG, Punjab Mr. V.K. Sandhir, Advocate for the complainant. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail to petitioner in case bearing FIR No.92 dated s 109, 304, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 of the Arms Act, 1959 at Police Station City Jhabal, District Tarn Taran. Learned counsel for the petitioner pursuant to the order dated 02.09.2025 passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined investigation and is no longer required for investigation of the Learned State counsel on instructions, corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Since the petitioner has joined the investigation and custodial interrogation is not required, the present petition is interim order dated 02.09.2025 is made absolute. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 42241-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 26.02.2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondent VINOD S. BHARDWAJ for the petitioner. Ms.) Savi Nagpal, AAG, Punjab. Mr. V.K. Sandhir, Advocate for the complainant. The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the for grant of anticipatory bail to dated 07.06.2025 registered under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 25 Jhabal, District Tarn Taran. ioner inter alia contends that passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined investigation and is no longer required for investigation of the Learned State counsel on instructions, corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not Heard learned counsel for the parties. ined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required, the present petition is allowed and the is made absolute. SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.02.27 10:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 103-2 CRM-M-42241-2025 (O&M) 6. However, if required, the petitioner(s) shall continue to join investigation as and when required to do so and shall abide by the terms and conditions, as laid down under Section 482 (2) BNSS. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) 26.02.2026 JUDGE Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.02.27 10:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document