Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2023 DAILYLAW 4697 (PNJ)

AMRIK SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/62217/2025 · 2026-02-26

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 105-2 Amrik Singh State of Punjab CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present :- Mr. Dr. ( VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 the petitioner in case under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 61(2) of the at Police Station 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner pursuant to the order dated has joined investigation and is no lo case. 3. Reply Singh Brar, PPS, District Fazilka Court. The same is taken on record 4. Learned State counsel on instructions, corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-62217 Date of decision: VERSUS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Mr. Rajat Dogra, Advocate for the petitioner Dr. (Ms.) Savi Nagpal, AAG, Punjab ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail to petitioner in case bearing FIR No.0128 s 318(4), 316(2), 61(2) of the Bha at Police Station City-2 Abohar, District Fazilka. Learned counsel for the petitioner pursuant to the order dated 12.11.2025 passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined investigation and is no longer required for investigation of the Reply dated 25.02.2026 by way of an affidavit of Singh Brar, PPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub District Fazilka has been filed on behalf of the respondent/State . The same is taken on record Learned State counsel on instructions, corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 62217-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 26.02.2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondent VINOD S. BHARDWAJ for the petitioner. Ms.) Savi Nagpal, AAG, Punjab . The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the for grant of anticipatory bail to dated 20.09.2025 registered Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 2 Abohar, District Fazilka.. Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that passed by this Court, the petitioner nger required for investigation of the by way of an affidavit of Sukhwinder eputy Superintendent of Police, Sub-Division Abohar, has been filed on behalf of the respondent/State today in the Learned State counsel on instructions, corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.02.27 10:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 105-2 CRM-M-62217-2025 (O&M) 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 6. Since the petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required, the present petition is allowed and the interim order dated 12.11.2025 is made absolute. 7. However, if required, the petitioner(s) shall continue to join investigation as and when required to do so and shall abide by the terms and conditions, as laid down under Section 482 (2) BNSS. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) 26.02.2026 JUDGE Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.02.27 10:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document