CRM-M-55028- IN THE H (220) ROHIT KUMAR STATE OF HAR CORAM: HON Present: Mr. P Mr. N MANISHA BATR 1. The p Section 483 of Bh for grant of regul registered under Sanhita, 2023 (for on] at Police Statio 2. The complaint filed by with the present p trust with the com The petitioner had of entering into a p of getting issued friends Kapil and -2025 (O&M) 1 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH MAR Versus
HARYANA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANIS Mr. Pankaj Bali, Advocate for the pet Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana ****
BATRA, J. (ORAL)
The present petition has been prefe of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanh f regular bail in case arising out of nder Sections 318(4), 336(3) and 3 (for short “BNS”) [Section 340(2) e Station Civil Line, District Sonipat. The aforementioned FIR was reg iled by the complainant Prahlad allegin sent petitioner by his co-villager Hari he complainant and money transactio er had induced him to part with a sum into a partnership in business of petrol ssued a licence for gun in his favou il and Pardeep to part with sum of Rs JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH
CRM-M-55028-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 30.01.2026 ... Petitioner
...Respondent
ANISHA BATRA
the petitioner preferred by the petitioner under a Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) ut of FIR No.22 dated 27.01.2025 and 338 of the Bharatiya Nyaya 40(2) and 61(2) of BNS added later ipat. s registered on the basis of the alleging that he had been introduced r Harish. The petitioner had created sactions had started between them. a sum of Rs.12 lakhs on the pretext petrol pump and also for the purpose favour. He had even induced his of Rs.3,50,000/- for the purpose of M) 2026 nder ) 2025 yaya later the uced eated hem. etext pose d his se of AMIT SHARMA 2026.01.30 14:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-55028- getting gun licence regarding movin subsequently the c receipts. He also in the similar man 3. After The petitioner w disclosure stateme some money, cell were saved, one l was revealed that sum of Rs.14 lakh accused Harish w completed. 4. It is a falsely implicated The subject offenc over 09 months an trial is likely to tak has been examined to be a reason fo deserves to be rele -2025 (O&M) 2 licence issued in their favour as well. moving application for issuance the complainant came to know that t e also came to know that the petitione r manner. After registration of FIR, investigatio ner was arrested on 05.04.2025. O tatement admitting his involvement y, cellphone in which the screenshots one laptop and some gold ornaments d that the petitioner had duped the fri 4 lakhs by making some representati rish was also arrested subsequently It is argued by learned counsel for t licated in this case. A false recovery offences are triable by Magistrate. H nths and 24 days. He is not required y to take time to conclude as only 02 o amined so far. His involvement in oth son for denying benefit of bail to him be released on bail. well. He had given them some slips ance of arm licences, however, that those are forged and fabricated titioner had cheated several persons stigation proceedings were initiated. 25. On interrogation, he suffered ent in the crime and got recovered nshots of fake slips of arm licences aments. During the investigation, it the friends of the complainant and a sentations as made to him. The co- uently. Investigation now stands l for the petitioner that he has been covery has been planted upon him. ate. He is in custody for a period of uired for further investigation. The y 02 out of 29 prosecution witnesses t in other cases cannot be considered to him. It is, thus, argued that he slips ever, cated rsons ated. fered ered nces n, it nd a - tands been him. d of The esses ered at he AMIT SHARMA 2026.01.30 14:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-55028- 5. Status State. It is argue petitioner are serio associate to part w forgery and use regarding moving offender as two m chances of his co therefore, argued t 6. This both the parties. 7. The p cheated the compl alleged to have us facie make out a c however, he is in trial in the near f examined. No use custody anymore. with the well set exception, that eve conviction sentenc grant of bail to th and the petitioner -2025 (O&M) 3 Status report and custody certificate h argued by learned State counsel th re serious in nature as not only he ind part with huge amount of money bu use of forged documents by issui oving applications for issuance of ar two more cases of similar nature are p his committing similar offences, if gued that the petition does not deserve This Court has heard the rival subm The petitioner in connivance with the complainant and his friends of huge ave used forged and fabricated receip out a case for commission of subject o is in custody since 05.04.2025. The near future are bleak as only two ou No useful purpose is going to be serv more. Taking into consideration the ell settled proposition of law that b hat even otherwise pre-trial incarcerati entencing, this Court is of the opinio l to the petitioner at this stage. Accor itioner is ordered to be released on ficate have been filed by respondent- sel that the allegations against the he induced the complainant and his ney but also committed offences of issuing false and fabricated slips of arm licences. He is a habitual e are pending against him. There are s, if extended benefit of bail. It is, eserve to be allowed. l submissions made by counsel for ith the co-accused is alleged to have huge amount of money and is also receipts. Though allegations prima bject offences against the petitioner, . The chances of conclusion of the two out of 27 witnesses have been served by detaining the petitioner in n the above discussed facts coupled that bail is the rule and jail is an rceration shall not be replica of post- opinion that a case is made out for Accordingly, the petition is allowed d on bail subject to his furnishing - t the d his es of slips itual e are It is, l for have also rima oner, f the been er in pled is an - t for wed hing AMIT SHARMA 2026.01.30 14:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-55028- personal as well Court/Duty Magis 8. It is cla as an expression o influence the outco 9. Since any, is rendered in 30.01.2026 Amit Sharma -2025 (O&M) 4 well as surety bonds to the sati Magistrate concerned. t is clarified that the observations mad sion of opinion of this Court on the m e outcome of the trial in any manner. Since the main petition has been all ered infructuous.
(MA Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes
  
e satisfaction of the learned trial s made above shall not be construed the merits of the case and shall not nner. een allowed, pending application, if (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE
Yes/No
trial trued ll not n, if AMIT SHARMA 2026.01.30 14:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.