Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2023 DAILYLAW 4635 (PNJ)

KIKKER SINGH ALIAS KIKKAR SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/4077/2026 · 2026-03-05

Rupinderjit Chahal

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-4077 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 342 KIKKER SINGH ALIAS KIKKAR SINGH STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present:- M for the petitioner. Ms. Aiman J. Chishti, AAG, Punjab. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Through the instant petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (For short “BNSS”), the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case Sections 115(2), 118(1), 3(5) of BNS, 2023 Dailpura, District Bathinda 2. On ordinate bench of this Court bail to the petitioner in a case FIR No.205 registered under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 3(5) of BNS, 2023, at Police Station Bhaika/ Dailpura, District Bathinda. that the petitioner and the complainant, both are brothers. He submits that the dispute is on account of the joint land and even 4077-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: KIKKER SINGH ALIAS KIKKAR SINGH Versus PUNJAB HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Imaan Singh Khara, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Aiman J. Chishti, AAG, Punjab. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) Through the instant petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (For short “BNSS”), the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No.205 dated 16.12.2025, registered under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 3(5) of BNS, 2023 Dailpura, District Bathinda. On 10.02.2026, the following order ordinate bench of this Court: - “Prayer in the present petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case FIR No.205 registered under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 3(5) of BNS, 2023, at Police Station Bhaika/ Dailpura, District Bathinda. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner and the complainant, both are brothers. He submits that the dispute is on account of the joint land and even IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-4077-2026 Date of decision: 05.03.2026 KIKKER SINGH ALIAS KIKKAR SINGH ….Petitioner ....Respondent HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL r. Imaan Singh Khara, Advocate Ms. Aiman J. Chishti, AAG, Punjab. Through the instant petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (For short “BNSS”), the petitioner FIR No.205 dated 16.12.2025, registered under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 3(5) of BNS, 2023, at Police Station Bhaika/ following order was passed by the co- Prayer in the present petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case FIR No.205 dated 16.12.2025, registered under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 3(5) of BNS, 2023, at Police Station Bhaika/ Dailpura, District Bathinda. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner and the complainant, both are brothers. He submits that the dispute is on account of the joint land and even ….Petitioner ....Respondent Through the instant petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (For short “BNSS”), the petitioner FIR No.205 dated 16.12.2025, registered under , at Police Station Bhaika/ - Prayer in the present petition is for grant of anticipatory dated 16.12.2025, registered under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 3(5) of BNS, 2023, at It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner and the complainant, both are brothers. He submits that the dispute is on account of the joint land and even GURPREET 2026.03.07 14:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-4077 otherwise, the injuries attributed to the petitioners were declared to be simple. He, thus, submits that no prima facie case as alleged against the petitioner is made out and he deserves to granted anticipatory bail. behalf of the be released on interim bail subject to the satis Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer. The petitioner shall join investigation before the Investigating Agency/Officer. He shall abide by the following conditions as envisaged under Section 482 interrogation by a police officer as and when required to do so. any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts to the court or to any police officer. permission of the court. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compli the order dated petitioner has joined the investigation. 4. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions Pal, has submitted that the petitioner ha longer required for further investigation. 4077-2026 2 otherwise, the injuries attributed to the petitioners were declared to be simple. He, thus, submits that no prima facie case as alleged against the petitioner is made out and he deserves to granted anticipatory bail. Notice of motion. Mr. Gorav Kathuria, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State. Adjourned to 05.03.2026. In the meantime, in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on interim bail subject to the satis Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer. The petitioner shall join investigation before the Investigating Agency/Officer. He shall abide by the following conditions as envisaged under Section 482 (2) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: (i) That the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required to do so. (ii) That the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer. (iii) That the petitioner shall not leave India without prior permission of the court.” Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compli the order dated 10.02.2026 passed by the co-ordinate bench of joined the investigation. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions has submitted that the petitioner has joined the investigation and longer required for further investigation. otherwise, the injuries attributed to the petitioners were declared to be simple. He, thus, submits that no prima facie case as alleged against the petitioner is made out and he deserves to be Mr. Gorav Kathuria, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on In the meantime, in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on interim bail subject to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer. The petitioner shall join investigation before the Investigating Agency/Officer. He shall abide by the following conditions as envisaged under Section 482 (2) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023:- (i) That the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required to do so. (ii) That the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer. (iii) That the petitioner shall not leave India without prior Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of ordinate bench of this Court, the Learned counsel for the State, on instructions of ASI Surinder joined the investigation and is no otherwise, the injuries attributed to the petitioners were declared to be simple. He, thus, submits that no prima facie case as be Mr. Gorav Kathuria, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on In the meantime, in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall faction of the Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer. The petitioner shall join investigation before the Investigating Agency/Officer. He shall abide by the following conditions as envisaged under Section 482 (i) That the petitioner shall make himself available for (ii) That the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such (iii) That the petitioner shall not leave India without prior ance of this Court, the of ASI Surinder no GURPREET 2026.03.07 14:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-4077 5. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the interim order dated is made absolute. The petitioner s when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS 05.03.2026 Gurpreet 4077-2026 3 In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the interim order dated 10.02.2026 passed by the co is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the the co-ordinate bench of this Court, hall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE speaking/reasoned? Yes/No In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the this Court, hall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.03.07 14:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.