Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2023 DAILYLAW 4548 (PNJ)

VINOD KUMAR AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/57253/2025 · 2026-01-22

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE 204 Vinod Kumar and State of Punjab CORAM : HON'BLE Present :- Mr. Mr. Mr. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The BNSS, 2023 for bearing FIR No. Indian Penal Code, 2. Lea pursuant to the have joined investigation case. 3. Learned averment and submits required for the 4. Heard 5. Since custodial interrogation interim order dated 6. However, investigation as conditions, as laid 22.01.2026 Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-57253 Date of decision: and others VERSUS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD Mr. K.B. Raheja, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Sr.DAG, Punjab Mr. Kamal, Advocate for the complainant. ***** BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The instant petition has been filed for grant of anticipatory bail to No. 44 dated 18.04.2025 registered Code, 1860 at Police Station Arniwala, Learned counsel for the petitioner order dated 13.10.2025 passed by investigation and are no longer required Learned State counsel on instruction submits that the custodial interrogation purpose of investigation. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Since the petitioners have joined interrogation is not required, the present dated 13.10.2025 is made absolute. However, if required, the petitioner(s) and when required to do so and laid down under Section 482 (2) BNSS. (VINOD speaking/reasoned : Yes/No reportable : Yes/No PUNJAB & HARYANA CHANDIGARH 57253-2025(O&M) decision: 22.01.2026 ...Petitioners ...Respondent VINOD S. BHARDWAJ petitioner. Punjab. complainant. filed under Section 482 of the to the petitioner(s) in case registered under Sections 406 of the Arniwala, District Fazilka. petitioners inter alia contends that by this Court, the petitioners required for investigation of the instructions, corroborates the said interrogation of the petitioners is not parties. the investigation and their present petition is allowed and the absolute. petitioner(s) shall continue to join and shall abide by the terms and BNSS. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.01.22 20:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document