CRM-M-39278 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 277 PARAMJEET ALIAS JYOTI AND OTHERS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT Present: Mr. Sandeep Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Nitish Yadav, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3. RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 01.05.2025, under Sections 115, 126, 190, 191(2), 351(3) BNS, registered at Police Station Sadar Jhajjar, District Jhajjar (Annexure P proceedings arising therefrom (Annexure P-2). 2. The had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 39278-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: PARAMJEET ALIAS JYOTI AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT Mr. Sandeep Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Nitish Yadav, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, for quashing of 01.05.2025, under Sections 115, 126, 190, 191(2), 351(3) BNS, registered at Police Station Sadar Jhajjar, District Jhajjar (Annexure P proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of 2). The Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate report qua the genuineness of the compromise. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-39278-2025 Date of decision: 29.04.2026 PARAMJEET ALIAS JYOTI AND OTHERS ….Petitioners ....Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Sandeep Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Nitish Yadav, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3. This is a petition filed under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik for quashing of FIR No.137, dated 01.05.2025, under Sections 115, 126, 190, 191(2), 351(3) BNS, registered at Police Station Sadar Jhajjar, District Jhajjar (Annexure P-1) and subsequent on the basis of compromise dated 01.07.2025 Court vide order dated 24.07.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. s ....Respondents Nagarik FIR No.137, dated 01.05.2025, under Sections 115, 126, 190, 191(2), 351(3) BNS, registered at subsequent 01.07.2025 24.07.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get was directed to send its GURPREET 2026.05.01 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-39278 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Civil Judge Senior Division, Jhajjar basis of the statements so recorde submitted report dated effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for and 3 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Following the principles laid of this Court in another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and Sections 115, 126, 190, 191(2), 351(3) BNS, registered at Police Station Sadar Jhajjar, District Jhajjar (Annexure P arising therefrom on the basis of 2) are quashed. 7. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. 29.04.2026 Gurpreet 39278-2025 2 Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Civil Judge Senior Division, Jhajjar and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, Civil Judge Senior Division, Jhajjar submitted report dated 15.04.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue Learned State counsel as well as counsel for have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 , this petition is allowed and FIR No.137, dated 01.05.2025, under Sections 115, 126, 190, 191(2), 351(3) BNS, registered at Police Station Sadar Jhajjar, District Jhajjar (Annexure P-1) and arising therefrom on the basis of compromise are quashed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got their statements recorded. On the Civil Judge Senior Division, Jhajjar has to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent Nos.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.137, dated 01.05.2025, under Sections 115, 126, 190, 191(2), 351(3) BNS, registered at Police Station 1) and subsequent proceedings se dated 01.07.2025 (Annexure P- Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got their statements recorded. On the has to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue .2 In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.137, dated 01.05.2025, under Sections 115, 126, 190, 191(2), 351(3) BNS, registered at Police Station subsequent proceedings - Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.05.01 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.