Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2023 DAILYLAW 4488 (PNJ)

SUBE SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/73256/2025 · 2026-03-07

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 104 Sube Singh State of Haryana CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present :- Mr. for the petitioner Ms. Chhavi Sharma, Astt. AG, Haryana PSI Sachin, P.S. Civil Lines, Jind. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 the petitioner in case under Sections 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 and Sections 109(1), 115 & 287 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner pursuant to the order dated has joined investigation and is no longer required for investigation of the case. 3. Learned State counsel on instructions, corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. Since the petitioner custodial interrogation is not required, the present petition is IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-73256 Date of decision: VERSUS Haryana HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Mr. Sunil Goswami, Advocate (through V.C.) for the petitioner. Ms. Chhavi Sharma, Astt. AG, Haryana SI Sachin, P.S. Civil Lines, Jind. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail to petitioner in case bearing FIR No.314 s 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 and Sections 109(1), 115 & 287 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at Police Station Civil Lines, Jind Learned counsel for the petitioner nt to the order dated 24.12.2025 passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined investigation and is no longer required for investigation of the Learned State counsel on instructions, corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Since the petitioner has joined the investigation and custodial interrogation is not required, the present petition is IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 73256-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 07.03.2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondent VINOD S. BHARDWAJ (through V.C.) Ms. Chhavi Sharma, Astt. AG, Haryana (through V.C.) with The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the for grant of anticipatory bail to dated 10.12.2025 registered s 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 and Sections 109(1), 115 & 287 of at Police Station Civil Lines, Jind. Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined investigation and is no longer required for investigation of the Learned State counsel on instructions, corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not Heard learned counsel for the parties. ined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required, the present petition is allowed and the SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.03.07 15:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 104 CRM-M-73256-2025 (O&M) interim order dated 24.12.2025 is made absolute. 6. However, if required, the petitioner(s) shall continue to join investigation as and when required to do so and shall abide by the terms and conditions, as laid down under Section 482 (2) BNSS. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) 07.03.2026 JUDGE Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.03.07 15:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document