Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2023 DAILYLAW 4402 (PNJ)

SHIV SHAKTI v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

CRM-M/67986/2025 · 2026-02-18

H S Grewal

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

                          ! "#$# %&'' ()( *     ( +      (    &, - ' ('(' . -' ////             '(' . -0 '1 -2  !  "#$Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 % &!     '   ()* +)*##)#+,-! .*/ !01 (*"2#+)3#)#+ !  2#)2)$ 4 +215 33.6 1    670.*8! ! 9 4  &!  9  9 #   !         !  9   .!      ! 4 9! 9 4  9 !  -&!    +  7  !           9   ! 9   4   2  (9 "  Ms. Ruchi Sekhri, Addl. A.G., Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2 and points out that the petitioner is the only technical hand who was competent enough to tamper with the toll machines. He used to provide the passwords of the toll machines to the co-accused. She further RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.02.20 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order    submits that the challan has already been presented before the Illaqa Magistrate and the charges have also been framed against the petitioner. 6. Be that as it may, since the challan has already been presented before the Court concerned and charges have also been framed against the petitioner, which means that the trial of the Case has already commenced, no ground is made out to quash the FIR in question. 7. Dismissed. 8. The petitioner is, however, at liberty to take up all pleas available to him in accordance with law before the trial Court at an appropriate stage.   1'(' . -2 +  0'                        RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.02.20 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order