IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 129 S-XXX H-XXX @ S State of Haryana CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present :- Mr. for the petitioner. Mr. Paras Talwar, Sr. DAG, Haryana VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 petitioner in case bearing FIR No. Sections 407, 420 on] of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 2. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that the case of the petitioner would be very simila accused Gaganpreet Singh and Parneet has been granted 23.01.2025 passed in CRM 3. Learned State Counsel does not dispute the 4. I have heard learned counsel appearing on behalf o respective parties and have gone through the documents appended alongwith the present petition. 5. In view of the the case of the petitioner would be identical to IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-44459 Date of decision: XXX @ S-XXX VERSUS Haryana HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ . Naresh Kumar Khepar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Paras Talwar, Sr. DAG, Haryana ***** BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The present first petition has been filed under Section agarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for tioner in case bearing FIR No.275 dated 18.09.2022 407, 420 [Sections 120-B, 201, 411, 467, 468, 471, 485 Indian Penal Code, 1860 at Police Station Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that the case of the petitioner would be very simila Gaganpreet Singh and Parneet, to whom has been granted by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court passed in CRM-M-2697-2025. Learned State Counsel does not dispute the I have heard learned counsel appearing on behalf o respective parties and have gone through the documents appended alongwith the present petition. In view of the undisputed facts noticed above and the petitioner would be identical to co IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 44459-2025(O&M) Date of decision: 25.02.2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondent VINOD S. BHARDWAJ , Advocate, Mr. Paras Talwar, Sr. DAG, Haryana. has been filed under Section 483 of the for grant of regular bail to the 18.09.2022 registered under B, 201, 411, 467, 468, 471, 485 added later at Police Station Saha, District Ambala. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner contends that the case of the petitioner would be very similar to the case of the co- to whom concession of regular bail ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated Learned State Counsel does not dispute the aforesaid facts. I have heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties and have gone through the documents appended alongwith facts noticed above and noticing that co-accused Gaganpreet Singh SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.02.26 09:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 129 CRM-M-44459-2025(O&M) and Parneet, to whom concession of regular bail has been granted by a Co- ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 23.01.2025 passed in CRM-M- 2697-2025, thus with a view to extend parity and keeping the case of the present petitioner at par with the co-accused, I deem it appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on regular bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court. 6. The instant petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on his furnishing requisite bail bond/surety bond to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate, concerned. 7. It is made clear that the petitioner shall not extend any threat and shall not influence any prosecution witnesses in any manner directly or indirectly. 8. The observation made hereinabove shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and the Trial Court shall decide the case on the basis of available material. 9. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. 25.02.2026 (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) Sumit Gusain JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.02.26 09:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document