CRM-M-10793 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 161 RAJESH KUMAR STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Parveen Ms. Sunita Nain, for the petitioner Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana. Mr. for respondent No.2. RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 31.10.2025, under Section B)(a) of Arms Act, (Annexure P-1 compromise dated 2. This to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was of the compromise. 10793-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: RAJESH KUMAR Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Parveen Moudgil, Advocate for Ms. Sunita Nain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Harinder Malik, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, for quashing of , under Section 115, 333 and 351(3) of BNS and Section 25(1 B)(a) of Arms Act, at Police Station Asauda 1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of dated 16.02.2026 (Annexure P-2). This Court vide order dated 24.0 to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-10793-2026 Date of decision: 08.04.2026 ….Petitioner ....Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL for Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana. This is a petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik for quashing of FIR No.339, dated 115, 333 and 351(3) of BNS and Section 25(1- Asauda, District Jhajjar, Haryana arising therefrom on the basis of ). .02.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded directed to send its report qua the genuineness ….Petitioner ....Respondents Nagarik , dated - Jhajjar, Haryana arising therefrom on the basis of had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded directed to send its report qua the genuineness GURPREET 2026.04.09 16:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-10793 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Civil Judge Junior Division/JMIC, Bahadurgarh recorded. On the basis of the statements so rec Division/JMIC, Bahadurgarh effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Following the principle of this Court in another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and Section 115, 333 and 351(3) of BNS and Section 25(1 Police Station Asauda, District Jhajjar, Haryana (Annexure P subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the b 16.02.2026 (Annexure P 7. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. 08.04.2026 Gurpreet 10793-2026 2 Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Civil Judge Junior Division/JMIC, Bahadurgarh recorded. On the basis of the statements so rec Division/JMIC, Bahadurgarh has submitted report dated effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. Learned State counsel as well as have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 this petition is allowed and FIR No.339, dated 31.10.2025, under Section 115, 333 and 351(3) of BNS and Section 25(1 Police Station Asauda, District Jhajjar, Haryana (Annexure P subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the b 16.02.2026 (Annexure P-2) are quashed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Civil Judge Junior Division/JMIC, Bahadurgarh and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, Civil Judge Junior has submitted report dated 10.03.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. s laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.339, dated 31.10.2025, under Section 115, 333 and 351(3) of BNS and Section 25(1-B)(a) of Arms Act, at Police Station Asauda, District Jhajjar, Haryana (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got their statements Civil Judge Junior to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily counsel for respondent No.2 In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to s laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.339, dated 31.10.2025, under B)(a) of Arms Act, at 1) and dated Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.04.09 16:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.