Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2023 DAILYLAW 4368 (PNJ)

SUNIL KUMAR v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/74149/2025 · 2026-03-12

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 114 Sunil Kumar State of Punjab CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present :- Mr. Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Sr.DAG, Punjab VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The instant the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 the petitioner in case Sections 115(2), 118(1), 127(1), 351(2), 351(3), Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Ludhiana. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner pursuant to the order dated joined investigation and is no longer required for investigation of the case. 3. Learned State counsel on instructions, corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. Since the petitioner interrogation is not required, the present petition is order dated 02.01.2026 6. However, if required, the petitioner(s) shall continue to join investigation as and when re conditions, as laid down under Section 482 (2) BNSS. 12.03.2026 Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-74149 Date of decision: VERSUS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Sr.DAG, Punjab. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The instant second petition has been filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail to petitioner in case bearing FIR No.51 dated s 115(2), 118(1), 127(1), 351(2), 351(3), Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at Police Station Learned counsel for the petitioner pursuant to the order dated 02.01.2026 passed by this Court, the petitioner has investigation and is no longer required for investigation of the case. Learned State counsel on instructions, corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Since the petitioner has joined the investigation and interrogation is not required, the present petition is 02.01.2026 is made absolute. However, if required, the petitioner(s) shall continue to join investigation as and when required to do so and shall abide by the terms and conditions, as laid down under Section 482 (2) BNSS. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 74149-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 12.03.2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondent VINOD S. BHARDWAJ for the petitioner. . petition has been filed under Section 482 of for grant of anticipatory bail to dated 23.02.2025 registered under s 115(2), 118(1), 127(1), 351(2), 351(3), 191(3) and 190 of the at Police Station Division No.7, District Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that passed by this Court, the petitioner has investigation and is no longer required for investigation of the case. Learned State counsel on instructions, corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not Heard learned counsel for the parties. ined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required, the present petition is allowed and the interim However, if required, the petitioner(s) shall continue to join quired to do so and shall abide by the terms and conditions, as laid down under Section 482 (2) BNSS. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.03.13 09:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document