CRM-M-69424 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 334 PARVINDER KUMAR AND ANOTHER STATE OF HARYANA CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Jasvinder Rao, for the petitioners. Mr. Vikram Singh, AAG, Haryana. Mr. for respondent No.2. RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing of Sections 316(2), 318(4) BNS, 2023 and Section 24 of Emigration Act, 1983, registered at Police Station Bahalgarh, District Sonipat (Annexure P subsequent proceedings arising and affidavit dated 2. This Court vide order dated to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 69424-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: PARVINDER KUMAR AND ANOTHER Versus HARYANA AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Jasvinder Rao, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vikram Singh, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Manjeet Saini, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing of FIR No.334, dated 16.10.2025, under Sections 316(2), 318(4) BNS, 2023 and Section 24 of Emigration Act, 1983, registered at Police Station Bahalgarh, District Sonipat (Annexure P subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of dated 04.11.2025 (Annexure P-2 and P This Court vide order dated 10.12.2025 to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded ed Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-69424-2025 Date of decision: 26.02.2026 ….Petitioners ....Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Vikram Singh, AAG, Haryana. This is a petition filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik FIR No.334, dated 16.10.2025, under Sections 316(2), 318(4) BNS, 2023 and Section 24 of Emigration Act, 1983, registered at Police Station Bahalgarh, District Sonipat (Annexure P-1) and therefrom on the basis of compromise deed 2 and P-3). 10.12.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded ed Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness ….Petitioners ....Respondents This is a petition filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik FIR No.334, dated 16.10.2025, under Sections 316(2), 318(4) BNS, 2023 and Section 24 of Emigration Act, 1983, 1) and compromise deed had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded ed Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness GURPREET 2026.02.28 11:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-69424 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Judicial Magistrate the basis of the stat Sonepat has submitted report dated compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Following the p of this Court in another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and Sections 316(2), 318(4) BNS, 2023 and Section 24 of Emigration Act, 1983, registered at Police Station Bahalgarh, District Sonipat (Annexure P subsequent proceedings arising th and affidavit dated 7. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. 26.02.2026 Gurpreet 69424-2025 2 Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sonepat and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, Judicial Magistrate has submitted report dated 19.12.2025 compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 , this petition is allowed and FIR No.334, dated 16.10.2025, under Sections 316(2), 318(4) BNS, 2023 and Section 24 of Emigration Act, 1983, registered at Police Station Bahalgarh, District Sonipat (Annexure P subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of dated 04.11.2025 (Annexure P-2 and P Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got their statements recorded. On ements so recorded, Judicial Magistrate First Class, 19.12.2025 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. rinciples laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.334, dated 16.10.2025, under Sections 316(2), 318(4) BNS, 2023 and Section 24 of Emigration Act, 1983, registered at Police Station Bahalgarh, District Sonipat (Annexure P-1) and erefrom on the basis of compromise deed 2 and P-3) are quashed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got their statements recorded. On First Class, to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without well as counsel for respondent No.2 In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to rinciples laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.334, dated 16.10.2025, under Sections 316(2), 318(4) BNS, 2023 and Section 24 of Emigration Act, 1983, 1) and compromise deed Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.02.28 11:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.