Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2023 DAILYLAW 4363 (PNJ)

BALWINDER SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/61860/2025 · 2026-01-27

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE 206 Balwinder Singh State of Haryana CORAM : HON'BLE Present :- Mr. for Ms. Mr. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The BNSS, 2023 for bearing FIR 117(2), 126, 127(2), 140(3) was deleted Naggal, District 2. Learned pursuant to the have joined investigation case. 3. Status Kumar, HPS, Deputy District Ambala The same is taken 4. Learned Naggal, Amritsar, custodial interrogation investigation. THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-61860 Date of decision: Singh and another VERSUS Haryana HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD Mr. Jagdeep Singh Chahal, Advocate the petitioner. Ms. Aditi Girdhar, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Ram Kumar Saini, Advocate for ***** BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The instant petition has been filed for grant of anticipatory bail to No.130 dated 12.09.2025 registered 127(2), 140(3), 190, 191(3), 351(2) deleted and Section 140(4) was added Ambala.. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) order dated 04.11.2025 passed by investigation and are no longer required Status report dated 14.01.2026 by Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ambala has already been filed on behalf taken on record. Learned State counsel on instruction Amritsar, corroborates the said averment interrogation of the petitioners is not PUNJAB & HARYANA CHANDIGARH 61860-2025(O&M) decision: 27.01.2026 ...Petitioners ...Respondent VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Advocate (through V.C.) for the complainant. filed under Section 482 of the to the petitioner(s) in case registered under Sections 115. 351(2) of the BNS, 2023 [Section added later on] at Police Station petitioner(s)inter alia contends that by this Court, the petitioners required for investigation of the way of an affidavit of Vijay Police, Headquarters, Ambala, behalf of the respondent-State. instruction from SI Ajmer, PS averment and submits that the not required for the purpose of SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.01.28 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 206 CRM-M-61860-2025(O&M) 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 6. Since the petitioners have joined the investigation and their custodial interrogation is not required, the present petition is allowed and the interim order dated 04.11.2025 is made absolute. 7. However, if required, the petitioner(s) shall continue to join investigation as and when required to do so and shall abide by the terms and conditions, as laid down under Section 482 (2) BNSS. 27.01.2026 (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) Sumit Gusain JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.01.28 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document