Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No.4160 of 2023 Birendra Parida ..... Petitioner Represented by Adv. - Mr. Dibya Ranjan Behera -versus- Rajendra Kumar Khandai, Secy., Naami Service Cooperative Society, Bhadrak ..... Opposite Party/Contemnor Represented by Adv. - baidhar sahoo,g.n.sahu,m.sahoo CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA Order No. ORDER 20.03.2026 05. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode). 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as the Contemnor-Opposite Party. 3. Alleging non-compliance of order dated 03.11.2022 passed in W.P.(C) No.18734 of 2022, the Petitioner has approached this Court by filing the present Contempt application. While disposing of the abovenoted writ application vide order dated 03.11.2022, this Court had directed to the Opposite Party No.2 to look into the grievance of the Petitioner and to consider the representation of the Petitioner in accordance with law within a period of four weeks. It was also Page 2 of 2. directed to dispose of the representation of the Petitioner by passing a speaking and reasoned order and that in the event it is found that the Petitioner is entitled to any amount, a further direction was given to pay such amount within a period of four weeks from the date of taking such decision. 4. Learned counsel for the Opposite Party-Contemnor referring to the compliance affidavit stated before this Court that in compliance of order dated 03.11.2022, the representation of the Petitioner has already been disposed of vide order dated 02.01.2023, at Annexure-D to the compliance affidavit, by the Secretary of the S.C.S Ltd. 5. In such view of the matter, the present contempt proceeding is dropped with liberty to the Petitioner to approach this Court again by filing a fresh writ application in the event the Petitioner feels aggrieved by order dated 02.01.2023. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the contempt proceeding is dropped. ( A.K. Mohapatra) Judge Rubi