Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2023 DAILYLAW 4350 (PNJ)

RAJESH SHARMA v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/9142/2023 · 2026-03-30

Alka Sarin, To Be Nominated

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

106 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-9142-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision : 30.03.2026 RAJESH SHARMA …. Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS …. Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI Present : Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate and Mr. Sukhdev Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG Haryana for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Vivek Goyal, Advocate for respondent No.4. ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL) CM-4629-CWP-2026 1. This is an application for withdrawal of the writ petition. 2. Notice of the application. 3. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 and Mr. Vivek Goyal, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.4-Gram Panchayat. Both the counsel state that they have no objection if the present application is allowed. 4. In view thereof, the present application is allowed. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is taken on Board today itself. AMAN JAIN 2026.03.31 14:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment CWP-9142-2023 (O&M) -2- CWP-9142-2023 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to avail his remedies as available in law. 6. Learned counsel for the respondents’ state that they have no objection. 7. Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off. (ALKA SARIN) JUDGE (RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI) 30.03.2026 JUDGE Aman Jain NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: Yes/No AMAN JAIN 2026.03.31 14:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment