Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2023 DAILYLAW 4308 (PNJ)

KULWINDER KAUR v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/8693/2026 · 2026-03-10

Mandeep Pannu

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

211 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA KULWINDER KAUR STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Mr. K.S. Brar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Hardeep Hans, AAG, Punjab. MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) The instant petition under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 has been filed for grant o 18.09.2025, under Section 21(b) of NDPS Act (later Section 29 of NDPS Act, added vide DDR No. 16, dated 07.10.2025), registered at Police Station Canal Colony, Bathinda This motion, granted the concession of interim bail to the petitioner, subject to his joining the investigation. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in order dated 13.02 Learned State counsel does not controvert the said fact and further submits that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required. In view of the above, the order dated Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. 10.03.2026 Himanshu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH KULWINDER KAUR VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Mr. K.S. Brar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Hardeep Hans, AAG, Punjab. MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) The instant petition under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 has been filed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner 18.09.2025, under Section 21(b) of NDPS Act (later Section 29 of NDPS Act, added vide DDR No. 16, dated 07.10.2025), registered at Police Station Canal y, Bathinda, District Bathinda. This Court vide order dated 13.02.2026 motion, granted the concession of interim bail to the petitioner, subject to his joining the investigation. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in order dated 13.02.2026, the petitioner has joined the investigation. Learned State counsel does not controvert the said fact and further submits that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required. In view of the above, the order dated Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. ( Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CRM-M-8693-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 10.03.2026 .....PETITIONER .....RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Mr. K.S. Brar, Advocate for the petitioner. The instant petition under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 has been cipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No. 236 dated 18.09.2025, under Section 21(b) of NDPS Act (later Section 29 of NDPS Act, added vide DDR No. 16, dated 07.10.2025), registered at Police Station Canal Court vide order dated 13.02.2026, while issuing notice of motion, granted the concession of interim bail to the petitioner, subject to his Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in pursuance to the , the petitioner has joined the investigation. Learned State counsel does not controvert the said fact and further submits that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required. In view of the above, the order dated 13.02.2026 is made absolute. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. (MANDEEP PANNU) JUDGE The instant petition under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 has been in FIR No. 236 dated 18.09.2025, under Section 21(b) of NDPS Act (later Section 29 of NDPS Act, added vide DDR No. 16, dated 07.10.2025), registered at Police Station Canal , while issuing notice of motion, granted the concession of interim bail to the petitioner, subject to his pursuance to the Learned State counsel does not controvert the said fact and further HIMANSHU 2026.03.11 10:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document