WORKMEN THROUGH BROWN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL EMPLOYEES UNION (REGD.) THROUGH ITS GENERAL SEC. LUDHIANA v. THE PRESIDING OFFICER AND OTHERS
CWP/1309/2023 · 2026-02-09
Kuldeep Tiwari
body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 4282 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 4282 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 117 CWP-1309-2023 Date of Decision : February 09, 2026 WORKMEN THROUGH BROWN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL EMPLOYEES UNION (REGD.), LUDHIANA -PETITIONER V/S THE PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, LUDHIANA AND OTHERS -RESPONDENTS
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Mr. Sharwan Sehgal, Advocate (Through V.C.) for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Patwalia, Advocate for the respondents No.2 and 3. *** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL)
1. The instant writ petition challenges the award dated 28.03.2022 (Annexure P-11), passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Ludhiana, whereby the petitioner has been granted only the relief of subsistence/ suspension allowance w.e.f. three months after the date of suspension, i.e. 04.10.2013, in terms of the Service Rules/Regulations of the respondents No.2 and 3- Christian Medical College, Ludhiana, until the passing of any
order on the pending enquiry.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondents No.2 and 3 submits that nothing survives for adjudication in the instant writ petition, as the impugned award has already been duly implemented. It is further submitted that, upon conclusion of the enquiry, an order of termination has been issued against the petitioner, which the petitioner has challenged DEVINDER YADAV 2026.02.10 09:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment
CWP-1309-2023 2 before the Industrial Tribunal concerned.
3. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the respondents No.2 and 3, which have not been controverted by learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant writ petition is dismissed, as having been rendered infructuous.
(KULDEEP TIWARI) February 09, 2026
JUDGE devinder Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No DEVINDER YADAV 2026.02.10 09:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment