IN THE 120 Kulwant Kaur State of Punjab and CORAM : HON'BLE Present :- Ms. for VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The Bharatiya Nagarik respondents No.1 the petitioner and 2. Learned that FIR No.43 the Bharatiya Nyaya Tarn Taran on the accused persons husband Charan had been granted accused person used casteist remarks contended that Scheduled Castes a representation. misused the concession 3. On THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-5278 Date of decision: VERSUS and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD s. Rubi Khokhar and Mr. Malkiat the petitioner. ***** BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The instant petition has been filed Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 No.1 to 3 to consider and decide the and take legal action against the pr Learned counsel appearing on behalf dated 25.10.2024 was registered Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at Police Station the statement of Kulwant Kaur (petitioner persons including one Boota Singh for Charan Singh. She further contends that granted to Boota Singh in August, came to the house of the petitioner remarks and threatened her of no action has been taken thereupon Castes and Scheduled Tribes Commission representation. It is alleged that the accused- concession of regular bail. a pointed query as to whether PUNJAB & HARYANA CHANDIGARH 5278-2026 (O&M) decision: 05.02.2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondents VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Malkiat S. Hundal, Advocates, filed under Section 528 of the for seeking directions to the representation submitted by private respondents. behalf of the petitioner contends registered under Sections 103, 3(5) of Station Kacha Pacca, District (petitioner herein) against the for committing murder of her that concession of regular bail August, 2025. Thereafter, the said petitioner in October, 2025 and of dire consequences. It is thereupon by the police and/or Commission despite submission of -respondent/Boota Singh has any application for seeking SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.02.07 16:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 120 CRM-M-5278-2026 (O&M) cancellation of the bail against Boota Singh has been filed, counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner fairly submits that such a petition has already been moved. 4. Under the given circumstances, once the petitioner has already taken recourse to appropriate proceeding for seeking cancellation of the bail against the respondent-accused/Boota Singh for misusing the concession and influencing the witnesses, no further directions in the present petition are required to be issued. The present petition is accordingly disposed of as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to pursue the remedy already invoked and/or pursue the remedy as are already available to him in accordance with law. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 05.02.2026 (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) Sumit Gusain JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.02.07 16:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document