IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 107-1 Jaspal Singh and another State of Punjab CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present :- Mr. Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Sr.DAG, Punjab Mr. Amit Arora, Advocate for the complainant. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 the petitioner in case Sections 118(2), 115(1 Sections 25, 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 arising out of FIR No.97 d 07.06.2025 registered under Sections 118(1), 118(2) added later on] of the Station Bhikhiwind, District Tarn Taran 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner pursuant to the order dated have joined investigation and case. 3. Learned State counsel on instructions, corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner required for the purpose of investigation. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-68163 Date of decision: Jaspal Singh and another VERSUS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Mr. Akash Manocha, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Sr.DAG, Punjab Mr. Amit Arora, Advocate for the complainant. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail to petitioner in case bearing GD No.33 dated 20.06.2025 registe Sections 118(2), 115(1), 119 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Sections 25, 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 arising out of FIR No.97 d 07.06.2025 registered under Sections 118(1), 115(2), 191(3), 190 [Section 118(2) added later on] of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Station Bhikhiwind, District Tarn Taran. Learned counsel for the petitioner pursuant to the order dated 03.12.2025 passed by th joined investigation and are no longer required for investigation of the Learned State counsel on instructions, corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner required for the purpose of investigation. Heard learned counsel for the parties. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 68163-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 18.03.2026 ...Petitioners ...Respondent VINOD S. BHARDWAJ for the petitioners. Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Sr.DAG, Punjab. Mr. Amit Arora, Advocate for the complainant. The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the for grant of anticipatory bail to GD No.33 dated 20.06.2025 registered under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25, 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 arising out of FIR No.97 dated 115(2), 191(3), 190 [Section Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at Police Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that passed by this Court, the petitioners no longer required for investigation of the Learned State counsel on instructions, corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not Heard learned counsel for the parties. SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.03.18 18:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 107-1 CRM-M-68163-2025 (O&M) 5. Since the petitioners have joined the investigation and their custodial interrogation is not required, the present petition is allowed and the interim order dated 03.12.2025 is made absolute. 6. However, if required, the petitioners shall continue to join investigation as and when required to do so and shall abide by the terms and conditions, as laid down under Section 482 (2) BNSS. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) 18.03.2026 JUDGE Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.03.18 18:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document