2023 is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 04.03.2023, registered at Police Station Sherpur, District Sangrur, under Sections 341, later on). 2. Superintendent of Police, Sub Division Dhuri, District Sangrur, filed in the Court, is taken on record. 3. custody for delay of 24 hours in lodging the FIR. the complainant, however, stated to be empty handed and has been implicated only on the dis Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 483 BNSS, is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 04.03.2023, registered at Police Station Sherpur, District Sangrur, under Sections 341, 323, 324, 148 IPC and Sections 307 and 326 IPC (added Status report by way of affidavit of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub Division Dhuri, District Sangrur, filed in the Court, is taken on record. Learned counsel contends that the petit custody for 4 months and 8 days. He alleges false implication. delay of 24 hours in lodging the FIR. He is alleged to have intercepted the complainant, however, stated to be empty handed and has been implicated only on the disclosure statement of co Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 483 BNSS, is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.11 dated 04.03.2023, registered at Police Station Sherpur, District Sangrur, under 148 IPC and Sections 307 and 326 IPC (added Status report by way of affidavit of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub Division Dhuri, District Sangrur, filed in Learned counsel contends that the petitioner has been in He alleges false implication. There is a He is alleged to have intercepted the complainant, however, stated to be empty handed and has been closure statement of co-accused, Sukhdev PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.02.18 18:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. Singh. It is a case, otherwise, of grievous injuries having been caused to the complainant and others. Charges have been framed on 05.07.2024, 2 material witnesses stand examined but there are still 16 more to go. He is not involved in any other case. 4. Learned State counsel opposes the bail on the ground that there are specific allegations against the petitioner by co-accused, of having been a part of the unlawful assembly. However, he is unable to controvert the submissions with regard to stage of the case and the petitioner being not involved in any other case. 5. Heard. 6. harges stand framed on 05.07.2024, however, 2 material witnesses have been examined, out of 18; 7. The petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail, subject to furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned, if not required in any other case and shall abide by the following conditions:- (i) The petitioner will not tamper with the evidence during the trial. (ii) The petitioner will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witnesses. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.02.18 18:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. (iii) The petitioner will appear before the trial Court on each and every date fixed, unless is exempted by a specific order of Court. (iv) The petitioner shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which, he is an accused, or for commission of which he is suspected of. (v) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly coerce, induce, threaten or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/ her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence in any manner. (vi) The petitioner shall not in any manner misuse his liberty. (vii) The petitioner shall furnish his address and mobile number by way of an affidavit to the trial Court and not change the same till conclusion of trial and if for any reasons, he seeks to change either of the aforesaid, it shall be done only with prior information to the learned trial Court. (viii) The petitioner shall not leave the country without prior permission of the trial Court. (ix) The trial Court/Duty Magistrate may impose any other condition, as deemed appropriate while releasing the petitioner. 8. It is made abundantly clear that in case there is any breach of the aforesaid conditions, the State shall be at liberty to seek cancellation of bail as granted to the petitioner by this order. 9. In view of the above, it is clarified that the observations made herein above are limited for the purpose of present proceedings and would not be construed as any opinion on the merits of the case and the trial would proceed independently of the aforesaid observations. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.02.18 18:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.