MAHENDER SINGH ALIAS MAHENDR AND ORS v. AJIT BALA JOSHI, CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR, HSVP
COCP/1050/2023 · 2026-05-05
Nidhi Gupta
body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 4211 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 4211 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
COCP-1050
IN THE HI
209
Mahender Si
Ajit Bala Jos
CORAM: H
Present: -
NIDHI GUP
1.
violation of Court in CW Haryana and
2.
amended rep Sh. Naveen record.
3.
petitioners.
4.
respondent t Narain and petitioners i which is alle 1050-2023
-1-
E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H
COCP Date o
der Singh @ Mahendr and others Versus
ala Joshi
M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH
Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate
Mr. Vishal Garg, Advocate for t
I GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
The present contempt petitio on of order dated 29.05.2009 (Annex CWP-8525-2009, titled as ‘Nepal and others’.
Learned counsel for the resp ed reply-cum-status report dated 04.0 aveen Kumar, Estate Officer, HSVP,
A copy thereof, has been suppl .
It is additionally pointed out dent that the writ petition bearing CW and others vs. State of Haryana an ners in the order dated 29.05.2009 is alleged, had already been dismiss
ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1050-2023 Date of Decision: 05.05.2026
.… Petitioners
.... Respondent NIDHI GUPTA vocate for the petitioners. te for the respondent. petition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by the Writ Nepal Singh and others vs. State of e respondent has filed in Court 04.05.2026 by way of affidavit of SVP, Faridabad, which is taken on supplied to learned counsel for the d out by learned counsel for the ing CWP-11143-2008 titled as ‘Jai na and others’, relied upon by the .2009 (Annexure P-1) violation of ismissed by the Division Bench of
ging Writ e of ourt it of n on r the the Jai the n of h of RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.06 11:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.
COCP-1050
this Court v passed in a 8346-2009 ti As such, not
5.
aforesaid sub
6.
7.
required to b of, according
8.
9.
05.05.2026 rishu
1050-2023
-2-
ourt vide consolidated order dated in a bunch of writ petitions being t 2009 titled as ‘Jagat Pal and others vs. h, nothing survives in the instant petit
Learned counsel for petitione aid submissions of leaned counsel for t
Heard.
In view of the facts noted ed to be passed in the present petition ordingly.
Rule stands discharged.
Pending application(s), if any, s 2026
Whether speaking/reasoned
Whether Reportable
dated 16.05.2019 (Annexure R-4) eing the main case bearing CWP- vs. State of Haryana and others’. t petition. titioners is unable to dispute the el for the respondent. above, no further orders are tition; and the same stands disposed any, shall also stand disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No
Yes/No
. the are sed RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.06 11:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.