Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2023 DAILYLAW 4205 (MAD)

S.SIBICHAKKARAVARTY v. THE CHAIRMAN

REV.APPL/51/2023 · 2026-03-24

K Surender, S M Subramaniam

Transfer Petitionbody2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Review Application No.51 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 24.03.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER Review Application No.51 of 2023 S.Sibichakkaravarty S/o.S.R.Shanmugham ... Petitioner vs. 1. The Chairman Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission TNPSC Road, V.O.C.Nagar Park Town, Chennai-600 003. 2. The Secretary Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission TNPSC Road, V.O.C.Nagar Park Town, Chennai-600 003. 3. Controller of Examination Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission TNPSC Road, V.O.C.Nagar Park Town, Chennai-600 003. … Respondents Review Application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure, praying to review the order dated Page Nos.1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Review Application No.51 of 2023 01.12.2022 made in W.A.No.760 of 2022. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Thanka Sivan For Respondents : Mr.I.Abrar Mohammed Abdullah Standing Counsel for TNPSC ***** O R D E R [Made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.,] The present review petition filed seeking to review the order of this Court dated 01.12.2022 passed in W.A.No.760 of 2022 is based on the grounds raised on merits. 2. The review petitioner had filed the writ petition seeking reevaluation of answer sheets in respect of the written examination for recruitment to the Group I Services, as notified by the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission on 01.01.2019. The writ Court dismissed the petition and the writ appeal also came to be dismissed. 3. Mr.S.Thanka Sivan, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that the marks entered are patently erroneous and that needs to be reviewed. While deciding the writ appeal, the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court had considered these aspects and decided the matter on merits. Page Nos.2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Review Application No.51 of 2023 Re-appreciation of facts in a review petition is impermissible and the scope of the review cannot be expanded beyond an error apparent, if any, is established. In the present case, an attempt has been made to re- adjudicate the issues and thus, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present writ petition. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. (S.M.S.,J.) (K.S.,J.) 24.03.2026 Index : Yes Neutral Citation : Yes Speaking order mk To 1. The Chairman Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission TNPSC Road, V.O.C.Nagar Park Town, Chennai-600 003. 2. The Secretary Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission TNPSC Road, V.O.C.Nagar Park Town, Chennai-600 003. 3. Controller of Examination Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission TNPSC Road, V.O.C.Nagar Park Town, Chennai-600 003. Page Nos.3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Review Application No.51 of 2023 S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, J., and K. SURENDER, J., mk Review Application No.51 of 2023 24.03.2026 Page Nos.4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis