Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2023 DAILYLAW 4199 (PNJ)

SUKHPREET SINGH ALIAS SUKHI v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/53753/2025 · 2026-02-02

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 261 Sukhpreet Singh @ Sukhi State of Haryana CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present :- Mr. Dr. (Ms.) Malvika Singh, DAG, Haryana. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The instant petition has been filed under Section BNSS, 2023 for Additional Sessions Judge, Fatehabad in FIR No. 161 dated 18.05.2022 registered under Sections 346 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Sections 148, 149, 323, 201, 302 of IPC and Section 3(2) (V) of SC/ later on and Section 346 was deleted] Fatehabad vide which the bail of the petitioner had been cancelled and surety bonds have been ordered to be forfeited to the State alongwith all consequential pr 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner pursuant to the order dated had appeared before the Trial Court and he learned Trial Court vide order dated 26.09.2025 3. Status report/short reply dated 22/23.12.2025 by way of an affidavit of Nar Singh, HPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ratia, District Fatehabad has already been filed on beha taken on record. 4. Learned State counsel on instruction IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-53753 Date of decision: Sukhpreet Singh @ Sukhi VERSUS Haryana HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Mr. Dinesh Maurya, Advocate, for the petitioner Dr. (Ms.) Malvika Singh, DAG, Haryana. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The instant petition has been filed under Section BNSS, 2023 for quashing of impugned order dated 01.05.2025 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fatehabad in FIR No. 161 dated 18.05.2022 registered under Sections 346 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Sections 148, 149, 323, 201, 302 of IPC and Section 3(2) (V) of SC/ later on and Section 346 was deleted] at Police Station vide which the bail of the petitioner had been cancelled and surety bonds have been ordered to be forfeited to the State alongwith all consequential proceedings arising therefrom. Learned counsel for the petitioner pursuant to the order dated 23.09.2025 passed by this Court, the petitione d appeared before the Trial Court and he has been granted bail by the learned Trial Court vide order dated 26.09.2025. Status report/short reply dated 22/23.12.2025 by way of an affidavit of Nar Singh, HPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ratia, District Fatehabad has already been filed on behalf of respondent/State. The same is taken on record. Learned State counsel on instruction IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 53753-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 02.02.2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondent VINOD S. BHARDWAJ for the petitioner. Dr. (Ms.) Malvika Singh, DAG, Haryana. The instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of the quashing of impugned order dated 01.05.2025 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fatehabad in FIR No. 161 dated 18.05.2022 registered under Sections 346 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Sections 148, 149, 323, 201, 302 of IPC and Section 3(2) (V) of SC/ST Act were added at Police Station City Ratia, District vide which the bail of the petitioner had been cancelled and surety bonds have been ordered to be forfeited to the State alongwith all Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that passed by this Court, the petitioner has been granted bail by the . Status report/short reply dated 22/23.12.2025 by way of an affidavit of Nar Singh, HPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ratia, District lf of respondent/State. The same is Learned State counsel on instructions, corroborates the said ...Respondent SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.02.03 15:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 261 CRM-M-53753-2025 (O&M) averment and does not dispute the facts as aforesaid. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 6. Since the petitioner has appeared before the Trial Court and he has already been granted bail by the Trial Court vide order dated 26.09.2025, the present petition is allowed and the interim order dated 23.09.2025 is made absolute. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) 02.02.2026 JUDGE Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.02.03 15:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document