Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2023 DAILYLAW 4178 (PNJ)

RAKESH v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/58725/2025 · 2026-02-04

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE 202 Rakesh State of Haryana CORAM : HON'BLE Present :- Mr. for Ms. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The BNSS, 2023 for FIR No.171 dated Drugs and Psychotropic District Jind. 2. Learned pursuant to the has joined investigation case. 3. Reply Rana, HPS, Deputy already been filed record. 4. Learned averment and submits required for the THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-58725 Date of decision: VERSUS Haryana HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD Mr. B.S. Beniwal, Advocate for Mr. the petitioner. Ms. Chhavi Sharma, Astt. AG, Haryana ***** BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The instant petition has been filed for grant of anticipatory bail to the dated 28.09.2025 registered under Section Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Learned counsel for the petitioner order dated 16.10.2025 passed investigation and is no longer required Reply dated 17.01.2026 by way of Deputy Superintendent of Police, filed on behalf of respondent/State. Learned State counsel on instructions, submits that the custodial interrogation purpose of investigation. PUNJAB & HARYANA CHANDIGARH 58725-2025 (O&M) decision: 04.02.2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondent VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Mr. Som Nath Saini, Advocate, Haryana. filed under Section 482 of the the petitioner in case bearing Section 21-B of the Narcotic 85 at Police Station Garhi, petitioner inter alia contends that by this Court, the petitioner required for investigation of the of an affidavit of Kamaldeep Narwana, District Jind has respondent/State. The same is taken on instructions, corroborates the said interrogation of the petitioner is not SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.02.04 19:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 202 CRM-M-58725-2025 (O&M) 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 6. Since the petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required, the present petition is allowed and the interim order dated 16.10.2025 is made absolute. 7. However, if required, the petitioner(s) shall continue to join investigation as and when required to do so and shall abide by the terms and conditions, as laid down under Section 482 (2) BNSS. 04.02.2026 (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) Sumit Gusain JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.02.04 19:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document