IN THE 129 Sanjay State of Haryana CORAM : HON'BLE Present :- Mr. Mr. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The Bharatiya Nagarik petitioner in case Section 15(b) of at Police Station 2. The secret information husk was recovered category of non-commercial 3. Learned that the petitioner other case. It is already complete contends that the 07 months and that which none has take long. THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-70782 Date of decision: VERSUS Haryana HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD . Dheeraj Narula, Advocate for the Mr. Paras Talwar, Sr. DAG, Haryana ***** BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The instant third petition has been filed Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for case bearing FIR No.306 dated of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Ellenabad, District Sirsa, Haryana The FIR in the present case has been information pursuant to which 25 kilograms recovered from the possession of the petitioner, commercial quantity. Learned counsel appearing on behalf petitioner is in custody since 10.09.2025 is further submitted that investigati complete and the chargesheet was filed the petitioner has already undergone that there are total 15 witnesses cited been examined so far and as suc PUNJAB & HARYANA CHANDIGARH 70782-2025(O&M) decision: 01.04.2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondent VINOD S. BHARDWAJ the petitioner. Haryana. filed under Section 483 of the grant of regular bail to the 10.09.2025 registered under Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Haryana. been registered on the basis of kilograms and 510 grams of poppy petitioner, which falls within the behalf of the petitioner contends 10.09.2025 and is not involved in any investigation in the present case is filed on 07.11.2025. He further undergone an actual custody of nearly cited by the prosecution out of such the conclusion of trial shall SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.04.01 18:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 129 CRM-M-70782-2025(O&M) 4. Learned State Counsel does not dispute the facts as aforesaid. 5. I have heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties and have gone through the documents appended along with the present petition. 6. Taking into consideration the period of custody already undergone by the petitioner, his clean antecedents, the nature of allegations levelled, recovered quantity being non-commercial as well as the stage of trial, I deem it appropriate to allow the present petition. 7. The instant petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on his furnishing requisite bail bond/surety bond to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate, concerned. 8. It is made clear that the petitioner shall not extend any threat and shall not influence any prosecution witnesses in any manner directly or indirectly. 9. The observation made hereinabove shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and the Trial Court shall decide the case on the basis of available material. 10. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. 01.04.2026 (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) Sumit Gusain JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.04.01 18:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document