CRM-M- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 125 PARAMBIR SINGH SANDHU STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SURYA P Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 29.07.2025 Class Jalandhar, the petitioner has been declared 2. 3. Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab behalf of respon dispensed with. However, n learned State counsel has opted to orally oppose the present petition -19305-2026(O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH PARAMBIR SINGH SANDHU VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA P Ms. Jyoti Sareen, Advocate and Ms. Anshul Mehta, Advocate Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section 528 of Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023’, seeking .2025 (Annexure P-13) passed by the learned Class Jalandhar, hereinafter being referred to as the petitioner has been declared a proclaimed person. Notice of motion. Since advance notice has already been served upon the State, Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab behalf of respondent/State. Hence, service of notice upon the State is hereby dispensed with. However, no formal reply has been filed by the State and the learned State counsel has opted to orally oppose the present petition 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-19305-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 10.04.2026 .....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PARTAP SINGH and Ms. Anshul Mehta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. This is a petition filed under Section 528 of ‘the Bharatiya ’, seeking for quashing of order dated ) passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First referred to as ‘trial Court’ only, whereby a proclaimed person. Since advance notice has already been served upon the State, Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab accepts notice on dent/State. Hence, service of notice upon the State is hereby formal reply has been filed by the State and the learned State counsel has opted to orally oppose the present petition. (O&M) .2026 .....PETITIONER .....RESPONDENTS Bharatiya for quashing of order dated Judicial Magistrate First only, whereby Since advance notice has already been served upon the State, accepts notice on dent/State. Hence, service of notice upon the State is hereby formal reply has been filed by the State and the GAURAV THAKUR 2026.04.10 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M- 4. the petitioner has been prosecuted in a complaint case, filed by the respondent No.2, under Negotiable Instruments Act. As per learned counsel for the petitioner, in the abovementioned complaint, after summoning order any summon or w residing at the given address. 5. any summons and he has not violated any condition of bail, it is hereby held that the offence for w 6. a direction to the petitioner to surrender before the learned trial Court within a period of one month from today. If the petitioner s learned trial Court within the stipulated period and moves an application for bail, the learned trial Court shall admit the petitioner to bail on the same day. Gaurav Thakur -19305-2026(O&M) It has been contended by learned counsel f the petitioner has been prosecuted in a complaint case, filed by the respondent No.2, under Negotiable Instruments Act. As per learned counsel for the petitioner, in the abovementioned complaint, after summoning order any summon or warrant was never served upon him, and that he was not residing at the given address. In view of the fact that the petitioner has never been served with any summons and he has not violated any condition of bail, it is hereby held that the offence for which he has been summoned, still remains bailable. In view of above, the present petition is hereby a direction to the petitioner to surrender before the learned trial Court within a period of one month from today. If the petitioner s learned trial Court within the stipulated period and moves an application for bail, the learned trial Court shall admit the petitioner to bail on the same day. 2 It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been prosecuted in a complaint case, filed by the respondent No.2, under Negotiable Instruments Act. As per learned counsel for the petitioner, in the abovementioned complaint, after summoning order arrant was never served upon him, and that he was not In view of the fact that the petitioner has never been served with any summons and he has not violated any condition of bail, it is hereby held hich he has been summoned, still remains bailable. In view of above, the present petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to surrender before the learned trial Court within a period of one month from today. If the petitioner surrenders before the learned trial Court within the stipulated period and moves an application for bail, the learned trial Court shall admit the petitioner to bail on the same day. or the petitioner that the petitioner has been prosecuted in a complaint case, filed by the respondent No.2, under Negotiable Instruments Act. As per learned counsel for the petitioner, in the abovementioned complaint, after summoning order arrant was never served upon him, and that he was not In view of the fact that the petitioner has never been served with any summons and he has not violated any condition of bail, it is hereby held with a direction to the petitioner to surrender before the learned trial Court within urrenders before the learned trial Court within the stipulated period and moves an application for bail, the learned trial Court shall admit the petitioner to bail on the same day. GAURAV THAKUR 2026.04.10 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document