CRM-M-33921 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 299(1) SHIV KUMAR AND ANOTHER STATE OF CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 registered against the petitioners vide GD No.37, dated 20.05.2025 (Annexure P replaced by Section FIR No.124, dated 20.05.2025, under Sections 115(2), 126 191(3), 190 of BNS consequential proceedings arising therein on the basis of co 16.06.2025 (Annexure P 33921-2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH SHIV KUMAR AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL None for the petitioners Ms. Aiman J. Chishti, AAG, Punjab. None for respondent No.2. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 praying for quashing of cross case/FIR registered against the petitioners vide GD No.37, dated 20.05.2025 (Annexure P-1) at PS Amargarh, under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 32(2) (later placed by Section 351(2) of BNS, 2023), Section 191(3), 190 of BNS FIR No.124, dated 20.05.2025, under Sections 115(2), 126 191(3), 190 of BNS, registered at Police Station Amargarh, along with all consequential proceedings arising therein on the basis of co 16.06.2025 (Annexure P-2). -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-33921-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 10.02.2026 ….Petitioners ....Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Ms. Aiman J. Chishti, AAG, Punjab. Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik praying for quashing of cross case/FIR registered against the petitioners vide GD No.37, dated 20.05.2025 1) at PS Amargarh, under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 32(2) (later 23), Section 191(3), 190 of BNS (in FIR No.124, dated 20.05.2025, under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 351(2), , registered at Police Station Amargarh, along with all consequential proceedings arising therein on the basis of compromise dated - Petitioners s Bharatiya Nagarik praying for quashing of cross case/FIR registered against the petitioners vide GD No.37, dated 20.05.2025 1) at PS Amargarh, under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 32(2) (later (in (2), 351(2), , registered at Police Station Amargarh, along with all mpromise dated GURPREET 2026.02.18 09:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-33921 2. directed to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court for recording their statements qua compromise on 08.10.2025 or any other date conve the learned trial Court report submitted by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Malerkotla, the parties failed to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court and did not comply with t 3. representation on behalf of the petitioners since last two dates, the present petition deserves dismissal. 4. have put in appearance since last two dates, it seems that the parties are no more interest hereby dismissed. 10.02.2026 Gurpreet 33921-2025 (O&M) Vide order dated 26.09.2025, the directed to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court for recording their statements qua compromise on 08.10.2025 or any other date conve the learned trial Court but not later than one week thereafter report submitted by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Malerkotla, the failed to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court and did not comply with the said order. Learned State counsel apprised representation on behalf of the petitioners since last two dates, the present petition deserves dismissal. In view of the above, consequently, since none of the parties have put in appearance since last two dates, it seems that the parties are no more interested in pursuing the present petition, hence, hereby dismissed. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No `ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No -2- Vide order dated 26.09.2025, the parties to the petition were directed to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court for recording their statements qua compromise on 08.10.2025 or any other date convenient to but not later than one week thereafter. But as per the report submitted by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Malerkotla, the failed to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court and did not Learned State counsel apprised the Court that since there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners since last two dates, the present consequently, since none of the parties have put in appearance since last two dates, it seems that the parties are no in pursuing the present petition, hence, the present petition is (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No - were directed to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court for recording their nient to . But as per the report submitted by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Malerkotla, the failed to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court and did not that since there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners since last two dates, the present consequently, since none of the parties have put in appearance since last two dates, it seems that the parties are no the present petition is (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.02.18 09:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.