CRM-M-39239 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 346-1 MANJEET AND OTHERS STATE OF HARYANA CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Anil Ghanghas, Mr. Abhishek Pahel, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vikram Singh, AAG, Haryana. M for respondent Nos.2 to 6. RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing of Sections 110, 115, 190, 191(3), 351(3) BNS, at Police Station Rai, District Sonipat, (Annexure P basis of compromise 2. Th had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magi their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 39239-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: MANJEET AND OTHERS Versus HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Anil Ghanghas, Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Pahel, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vikram Singh, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Dhruv Singh, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 6. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing of FIR No.188, dated 20.06.2025, under Sections 110, 115, 190, 191(3), 351(3) BNS, at Police Station Rai, District pat, (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the compromise dated 12.07.2025 (Annexure P The co-ordinate bench of this Court vide order dated had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magi their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-39239-2025 Date of decision: 26.02.2026 ….Petitioners ....Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL with Mr. Vikram Singh, AAG, Haryana. This is a petition filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik FIR No.188, dated 20.06.2025, under Sections 110, 115, 190, 191(3), 351(3) BNS, at Police Station Rai, District subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the (Annexure P-2). Court vide order dated 11.12.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. ….Petitioners ....Respondents This is a petition filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik FIR No.188, dated 20.06.2025, under Sections 110, 115, 190, 191(3), 351(3) BNS, at Police Station Rai, District subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the 11.12.2025 strate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its GURPREET 2026.02.28 12:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-39239 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Judicial Magistrate the basis of the statements so recorded, Judicial Magistrate Sonipat has submitted report dated compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No 6 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings bef 6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court SCC 303, this petition is allowed and Sections 110, 115, 190, 191(3), 351(3) BNS, at Police Station Rai, District Sonipat, (Annexure P basis of compromise 7. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. 26.02.2026 Gurpreet 39239-2025 2 Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sonipat and go the basis of the statements so recorded, Judicial Magistrate has submitted report dated 23.02.2026 compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without cion or undue influence. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 , this petition is allowed and FIR No.188, dated 20.06.2025, under Sections 110, 115, 190, 191(3), 351(3) BNS, at Police Station Rai, District Sonipat, (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedin compromise dated 12.07.2025 (Annexure P Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, Judicial Magistrate First Class, 23.02.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent Nos.2 to have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to ore the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.188, dated 20.06.2025, under Sections 110, 115, 190, 191(3), 351(3) BNS, at Police Station Rai, District subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the (Annexure P-2) are quashed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the t their statements recorded. On First Class, to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without to In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.188, dated 20.06.2025, under Sections 110, 115, 190, 191(3), 351(3) BNS, at Police Station Rai, District gs arising therefrom on the Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.02.28 12:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.